Push-Push Lipstick Cup Refill Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lipstick packaging devices are not cost-effective for refilling, as they require complex modifications and expensive interchangeable cups, leading to unnecessary waste when the product is depleted.

Innovation Solution

A device with a 'push-to-lock/push-to-release' latch system allows for easy refilling by using a cup with a stud engaged in a helical groove, enabling the upper cup to be locked and unlocked with a single axial thrust, reducing the need for costly modifications and allowing for simple refilling without damaging the product.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional lipstick packaging devices are used, then the structure is simple, but the device cannot be refilled and requires complete replacement when product is depleted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverefillabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cup is divided into two separable parts: an upper cup that holds the lipstick stick and a lower cup that remains in the device. This segmentation allows the upper cup to be removed and replaced when the product is depleted, enabling refilling without replacing the entire device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The upper cup nests within the lower cup during assembly and storage, with the upper cup being insertable into and removable from the lower cup. This nested configuration allows for compact storage while maintaining easy interchangeability of the product-holding portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If interchangeable cups are used to enable refilling, then refillability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverefillabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the cup into reusable lower cup and replaceable upper cup, the manufacturing cost is distributed: the expensive lower cup with mechanism is made once, while cheaper upper cups can be mass-produced and replaced independently, reducing overall refilling costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The upper cup is designed as a disposable or replaceable component that can be manufactured at low cost, while the main device structure (lower cup) is reused. This approach reduces the cost burden of refilling compared to replacing entire expensive devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex removable cup mechanisms are used, then refillability is improved, but the structure becomes complex requiring significant modification

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverefillabilityVSAvoidstructural modification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lower cup is designed with universal features including the helical groove and longitudinal groove that work with both the original cup and the new upper cup. This universal design allows the lower cup to serve multiple functions: holding the cup, providing rotational movement, and enabling locking/unlocking, without requiring additional complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking/unlocking mechanism is merged into the cup structure itself through the stud and groove interaction, rather than being a separate mechanism. The stud on the lower cup engages with the helical groove and longitudinal groove to provide both movement control and locking function in an integrated manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the cup is made removable for refilling, then adaptability is improved, but the product may be damaged during removal

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverefillabilityVSAvoidproduct damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The upper cup containing the lipstick stick is extracted as a complete assembly from the lower cup, rather than disassembling the lipstick stick itself. This extraction method allows the product to be removed intact without applying radial mechanical stress or force that could damage the lipstick stick.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The stud and groove mechanism acts as an intermediary that transfers axial force during locking and unlocking without applying radial stress to the upper cup or product. The mechanical interaction is mediated through the grooves and stud, protecting the product from damaging forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12108863B2Device for packaging and applying a stick of product, notably a cosmetic product, method for insertion and removal of said stick and kit for production of an assembly comprising said device
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 LOREAL SA
  • US12108863B2 patent drawing
  • US12108863B2 patent drawing
  • US12108863B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device (10) for packaging and applying a pasty product, notably a cosmetic product, comprising: a case (14); an external protective shell (30) mounted on the case (14) and provided on the interior surface thereof with at least one helical groove (36); a tubular element (40) mounted to rotate freely in said external protective shell (30), while being held axially relative to said shell and provided with at least one longitudinal groove (42); and a cup (20) supporting a stick (12) of product mounted to slide in said tubular element (40). The cup (20) comprises a lower cup (22) carrying the stud (23) and an upper cup (24) carrying the stick (12) of product and comprising an axial projection (24c) extending axially toward the base of the case (14) through an orifice (22d) provided on the lower cup (22), said lower and upper cups (22, 24) being integral via a “push-push” latch locking/unlocking system (50).