Golf Putter Head with Variable Rigidity Hitting Face

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional golf putters exhibit low fault tolerance and stability due to inconsistencies in the hitting point, leading to varying ball speed and distance, which affects precise ball control.

Innovation Solution

A golf putter head design featuring a hitting face with a hitting unit that increases in rigidity from the middle section outwardly, providing a gradual increase in momentum and velocity, reducing distance loss and enhancing fault tolerance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional putter head with uniform hitting face is used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the fault tolerance is low and ball control precision deteriorates due to hitting point inconsistencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidhitting face structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hitting face is designed with varying rigidity across different regions. The middle section has lower rigidity to provide a larger effective hitting area and forgive off-center hits, while the toe and heel sections have higher rigidity to maintain structural stability. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction by improving fault tolerance through strategic rigidity distribution without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The hitting face is segmented into multiple regions with different rigidity characteristics. The middle section is separated from the toe and heel sections, each with optimized rigidity properties. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each region's performance, achieving high fault tolerance in the middle while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the rigidity of the hitting unit is increased uniformly across the entire hitting face, then the structural stability improves, but the fault tolerance decreases because off-center hits result in greater distance variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidball movement consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the hitting face are assigned different rigidity values tailored to their specific functional requirements. The middle section uses lower rigidity to maximize forgiveness for off-center hits, while toe and heel sections use higher rigidity for structural support. This local differentiation simultaneously improves fault tolerance and maintains ball movement consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rigidity parameter of the hitting unit is varied across different spatial locations rather than maintained uniformly. By changing the rigidity parameter from the middle section outward to the toe and heel sections, the design achieves optimal performance for both fault tolerance and ball movement consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the middle section of the hitting face has high rigidity, then structural stability improves, but the effective hitting area decreases and fault tolerance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehitting face stabilityVSAvoidfault tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The middle section of the hitting face is designed with lower rigidity specifically to maximize the effective hitting area and improve fault tolerance. The toe and heel sections compensate with higher rigidity to maintain overall structural stability. This local quality assignment resolves the contradiction by placing appropriate rigidity characteristics in the right locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rigidity distribution across the hitting face is asymmetric, with the middle section having different rigidity properties compared to the toe and heel sections. This asymmetric design allows the middle section to prioritize fault tolerance while the perimeter sections prioritize structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS20200261777A1Golf putter head and putter
Publication Date: 2020.08.20 WONG TAT
  • US20200261777A1 patent drawing
  • US20200261777A1 patent drawing
  • US20200261777A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a golf putter head and a golf putter including the putter head. The golf putter head comprises a putter head having a hitting face on which a hitting unit is distributed. The rigidity of the hitting unit is increased from the middle to both sides in the width direction of the hitting face. The golf putter comprises a putter shaft and a putter head coupled to putter shaft.