Putter Hosel Weight Distribution via Multi-Material Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional putter-type golf clubs lack desirable feel and performance due to their design shortcomings, particularly in the distribution of weight and materials used in the club head.

Innovation Solution

A putter-type golf club head design featuring a hosel with a beam, struts, and recesses made from different materials, where the hosel is positioned to optimize weight distribution and include a face insert with a contrasting material and texture for improved impact characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional putter-type golf clubs use uniform material construction, then manufacturing is simple, but feel and performance are lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeel and performanceVSAvoidmaterial distribution complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different materials for different parts of the club head. Specifically, the hosel assembly includes a beam made of a first material while the struts are made of a second material, creating localized material properties that optimize both feel and structural performance without requiring complete redesign of the entire club head.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining multiple materials within the hosel assembly. The beam and struts use different materials with complementary properties, and the face insert uses a contrasting material, creating a composite structure that delivers superior feel and performance compared to uniform material construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If weight is concentrated in one area of the club head, then structural strength is improved, but balance and control are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidbalance and control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the weight distribution by creating separate structural elements (beam and struts) with different materials and densities. This segmentation allows weight to be distributed across multiple components rather than concentrated in one area, achieving both structural strength through the beam and balance through the distributed mass of the struts and face insert.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter of the hosel assembly components to control weight distribution. By selecting materials with different densities for the beam and struts, and adding a face insert with contrasting material properties, the patent optimizes both structural strength and balance/control characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the hosel is positioned rearward, then structural stability is improved, but impact characteristics are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidimpact characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by positioning the contrasting material face insert at the forward impact area. This local placement of different material properties at the strike face optimizes impact characteristics without requiring the entire hosel assembly to be positioned forward, thereby maintaining structural stability while improving impact performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If single material is used throughout the club head, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but feel and performance are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeel and performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by limiting multi-material construction to specific high-impact areas (hosel assembly and face insert) rather than the entire club head. This approach maintains feel and performance through localized material optimization while avoiding the manufacturing complexity of multi-material construction throughout the whole club head.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the multi-material construction to only the hosel assembly and face insert components, keeping the main club head body as a single material. This segmentation reduces manufacturing complexity compared to multi-material construction throughout, while still achieving superior feel and performance through the strategically placed different materials in the hosel and face insert.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240216766A1Putter-type golf club head
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC
  • US20240216766A1 patent drawing
  • US20240216766A1 patent drawing
  • US20240216766A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A putter-type golf club head includes a body and a hosel coupled to the body. The hosel includes a beam coupled directly to and extending along the top of the body. The hosel also includes a first strut, at a first oblique angle relative to the beam, including a first-strut lower end coupled directly to the heelward end of the beam, and including a first-strut upper end. The hosel further includes a second strut, at a second oblique angle relative to the beam, including a second-strut lower end coupled directly to the toeward end of the beam, and including a second-strut upper end coupled directly to the first-strut upper end. The hosel additionally includes a forward recess and a rearward recess. The hosel also includes a socket, coupled directly to the first-strut upper end and to the second-strut upper end, and configured to mate with a golf club shaft.