PuttRail Golf Training Aid Slope Segmentation Speed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing golf putting training devices focus primarily on aiming and swinging motion, neglecting the critical aspect of putt speed, which is essential for achieving the objective of putting the ball in the cup or nearest to the hole.

Innovation Solution

A golf training aid that utilizes two parallel rails with an upward slope and varying hole distances, allowing golfers to practice hitting putts of different speeds, with the ball returning through a gutter for repeated practice, promoting hand-eye coordination and muscle memory for proper speed control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional putting training devices are used, then aiming and swinging motion can be practiced, but putting speed control cannot be effectively trained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveputting speed controlVSAvoidtraining function coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The putting surface is segmented into multiple sections with different slopes (first slope, second slope, third slope), each section providing different resistance to ball rolling. This segmentation allows the ball to travel different distances based on the putting force applied, enabling speed control training across varying terrain conditions within a compact space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds the dimension of slope variation to the traditional flat putting surface. By incorporating multiple slopes at different angles and positions, the device creates a three-dimensional putting environment that simulates real course conditions while maintaining a small footprint, thus enabling speed control training without requiring large space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Length of moving object

If a large area is used to simulate long putts, then realistic putting distances can be achieved, but the device becomes too large for indoor use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveputting distance simulationVSAvoiddevice footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses vertical slope variations to compress horizontal distance. Multiple slopes (first, second, and third slopes) are arranged in a compact configuration that allows the golf ball to travel equivalent distances of 10-20 feet putts within a much smaller horizontal footprint, making the device suitable for indoor spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs nested slopes where the second slope is positioned within the structure of the first slope, and the third slope is integrated within the second slope. This nesting arrangement maximizes the effective putting distance within the minimum possible device footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple holes at different distances are provided, then various putting distances can be practiced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveputting distance varietyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The putting surface is divided into three distinct slope sections, each creating different ball travel distances. The first slope creates a first distance, the second slope creates a second distance, and the third slope creates a third distance. This segmentation provides three different putting distance options using a unified, integrated structure rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The single integrated device structure serves multiple functions by providing three different putting distances through its slope design. The same structural elements (rails, slopes, gutter) serve all three distance configurations simultaneously, eliminating the need for multiple separate training devices or complex adjustable mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If repeated putting practice is enabled, then muscle memory can be developed, but manual ball retrieval increases practice time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepractice efficiencyVSAvoidtime per practice session
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates a gutter system that automatically returns the golf ball to the starting position after each putt. The gutter receives the ball from the third slope and guides it back to the beginning of the first slope, enabling continuous practice without manual intervention. This self-service mechanism eliminates the time loss associated with manually retrieving and repositioning the ball.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The gutter creates a continuous loop for the golf ball, allowing the golfer to immediately follow up one putt with another. The ball continuously cycles through the slopes and returns to the start, maintaining the practice action without interruption or idle time for ball retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables golfers to effectively practice and improve their putting speed, a crucial aspect of golf, by simulating longer putts within a small area, improving their putting stroke and speed control.

Implementation Method 1

an upward slope and varying hole distances, allowing golfers to practice hitting putts of different speeds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

the ball returning through a gutter for repeated practice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11850487B2PuttRail
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 MARVIN CRAIG JOHN
  • US11850487B2 patent drawing
  • US11850487B2 patent drawing
  • US11850487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A consumer apparatus that golfers of any level may use to practice their putting stroke mainly in an indoor environment. The putting practice device requires the user to propel the golf ball on top of a set of parallel rails up a slope and into one of different cup holes. Each hole has a door which may be opened and/or closed. The doors also have rails that let the golf ball continue up the slope to the hole of the user's choice. This lets the user practice hitting different lengths of putts in a short space.