PV Backtracking Control for Uneven Terrain and Row Shading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flat-ground backtracking algorithms for photovoltaic systems are inaccurate on uneven terrains, leading to shading between modules and a sharp drop in power generation, especially with series-parallel modules like half-cut photovoltaic modules.

Innovation Solution

A backtracking angle optimization method for series-parallel photovoltaic modules that adjusts tracking angles based on solar altitude and azimuth angles, using first and second optimization methods to minimize shading, ensuring optimal power generation on uneven terrains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If flat-ground backtracking algorithms are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the backtracking angle accuracy deteriorates on uneven terrains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacktracking algorithm complexityVSAvoidbacktracking angle accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the input parameters from simple flat-ground assumptions to comprehensive terrain parameters including ground elevation data, module installation angles, and row spacing. This allows the algorithm to calculate accurate backtracking angles specifically adapted to uneven terrain conditions while maintaining reasonable computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the terrain into discrete measurement points along each row and uses these segmented data points to calculate backtracking angles. By dividing the continuous terrain into manageable segments, the algorithm achieves high accuracy on uneven ground without requiring overly complex continuous mathematical models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If backtracking angle is increased to avoid shading, then shading between rows is reduced, but power generation efficiency deteriorates due to suboptimal solar tracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshading between rowsVSAvoidpower generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic backtracking angle adjustment that varies continuously based on solar position, terrain characteristics, and row configuration. Rather than using fixed conservative angles, the system dynamically calculates optimal angles that minimize shading while maximizing energy capture throughout the day, resolving the trade-off between avoiding shading and maintaining tracking efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from solar position data and terrain measurements to continuously optimize backtracking angles. By monitoring actual shading conditions and solar geometry, the algorithm adjusts angles in real-time to achieve the optimal balance between preventing inter-row shading and maintaining high power generation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conservative backtracking angles are used to prevent shading, then shading is minimized, but the backtracking performance deteriorates with loss of power generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshading between modulesVSAvoidpower generation in backtracking phase
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by considering specific local terrain conditions, module orientations, and row spacings to determine appropriate backtracking angles for each location. Rather than using uniform conservative angles across the entire system, the algorithm tailors angles to local conditions, minimizing shading where needed while preserving power generation where terrain and geometry allow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial backtracking action only when and where shading would occur, rather than consistently applying maximum backtracking angles. By using excessive action selectively - applying larger angles only when terrain and solar position require it - the system prevents shading problems while avoiding unnecessary loss of power generation efficiency during periods when shading is not an issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4692974A1Backtracking angle optimization method and photovoltaic support control system applying same
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 TRINA SOLAR CO LTD
  • EP4692974A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4692974A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4692974A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A backtracking angle optimization method (10), based on a series-parallel structure photovoltaic module, and a photovoltaic support control system applying same. The backtracking angle optimization method (10) is suitable for a photovoltaic system comprising multiple rows of series-parallel structure photovoltaic modules. When each row of photovoltaic modules is shielded in a manner not exceeding a first area, at least a portion of the photovoltaic modules outside of the first area may still operate at a normal power generation efficiency. The backtracking angle optimization method (10) comprises switching execution of a first optimization method and a second optimization method, the first optimization method comprising controlling each row of photovoltaic modules to shield at most a portion of the first area of the row of photovoltaic modules behind said row of photovoltaic modules, and the second optimization method comprising controlling such that there is no shielding between every two adjacent rows of photovoltaic modules.