PV Module Lamination Cycle Time Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The lamination process for photovoltaic (PV) modules, particularly those using ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) based encapsulant layers, faces challenges in reducing cycle time due to the need for crosslinking reactions and volatile removal, which increases production costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A lamination process involving a polymer composition with silane groups that allows for lamination at lower temperatures and shorter cycle times without the need for crosslinking agents like peroxide or silane condensation catalysts, enabling direct pressure application when the polymer reaches a temperature 3-10°C above its melting point.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If crosslinking reactions and volatile removal steps are added to the lamination process to ensure proper bonding and quality, then the reliability and quality of PV modules are improved, but the lamination cycle time increases and production efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of PV modulesVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the crosslinking agent (peroxide or silane condensation catalyst) from the polymer composition, thereby eliminating the need for crosslinking reactions and volatile removal steps. This extraction of the problematic component allows direct lamination without extended cycle times, resolving the contradiction between quality assurance and production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the key parameter of the polymer composition by selecting a polymer without crosslinking functionality. This parameter change fundamentally alters the lamination process, allowing it to proceed without the time-consuming crosslinking and volatile removal steps while still achieving reliable bonding through proper selection of polymer and lamination conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If crosslinking agents like peroxide or silane condensation catalysts are introduced to achieve proper lamination bonding, then the strength and adhesion of the laminate are improved, but the process complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion of laminateVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the crosslinking agents (peroxide or silane condensation catalysts) from the system, eliminating the associated complexity of introducing, handling, and controlling these chemicals. The adhesion is achieved through alternative means by selecting appropriate polymer materials and optimizing lamination parameters without requiring additional chemical agents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a simple polymer composition that does not require expensive crosslinking agents or complex catalytic systems. The polymer itself provides the necessary bonding properties through its inherent characteristics, eliminating the need for additional costly chemical additives and simplifying the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If pressure is applied immediately when the polymer melts to reduce cycle time, then the productivity is improved, but the risk of damaging fragile photovoltaic cells increases due to high stress on insufficiently molten polymer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle timeVSAvoidintegrity of photovoltaic cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the melting temperature parameter of the polymer to be lower (below 100°C). This parameter change allows the polymer to melt quickly and reach sufficient fluidity at lower temperatures, enabling pressure to be applied sooner in the heating cycle without risking cell damage from applying pressure to insufficiently molten material, thus reducing cycle time while maintaining cell integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces lamination cycle time, avoids premature crosslinking issues, and eliminates the need for volatile removal steps, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective production of high-quality PV modules.

Implementation Method 1

the pressing step (iii) is started when the at least one polymeric layer element reaches a temperature which is at least 3 to 10°C higher than the melting temperature of the polymer (a)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

heating step to heat up the multilayer assembly optionally in a chamber at evacuating conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3370959B9A process for producing a multilayer laminate
Publication Date: 2023.03.08 BOREALIS AG
  • EP3370959B9 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3370959B9 patent drawing
  • EP3370959B9 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a lamination process for producing a multilayer laminate which comprises a one or more substrate element(s) and one or more polymeric layer element(s), preferably to a lamination process for producing a photovoltaic (PV) module,and to a PV module laminate.