PV Module Support Profiles for Low-Angle Flat Roof Installation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inclined arrangements for photovoltaic (PV) modules on flat roofs with inclinations less than 10° offer limited yield and self-cleaning, while conventional solutions are economically unviable due to complexity, and existing solutions with a slight increase in inclination are material-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A simplified inclined arrangement using front and rear support profiles with parallel spacing on the roof, featuring an undercut longitudinal groove and rounded tops to allow for static support at various angles, providing a small but cost-effective increase in inclination (5°-8°) with reduced material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If PV modules are installed parallel to the roof on flat roofs with inclination less than 10°, then the installation is simple, but the yield and self-cleaning are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The support system is segmented into front and rear support profiles with different support heights, allowing the PV module to be inclined relative to the roof while maintaining simple installation through modular components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The front and rear support profiles have asymmetric support heights, with the rear support profile having a greater support height than the front support profile, creating an inclined arrangement that improves yield and self-cleaning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Productivity

If conventional roof elevations with 30° inclination are used, then the yield is optimized, but the complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of implementing a full 30° roof elevation which would be complex and costly, the invention applies a partial inclination increase of 5°-8° through simple support profiles, achieving sufficient yield improvement without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the inclination parameter from 0° (parallel to roof) to 5°-8° by adjusting the support height difference between front and rear support profiles, achieving optimal yield without the complexity of conventional roof elevations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If existing inclined arrangements with slight inclination increase are used, then the yield improves slightly, but the material usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The support profiles utilize thin-walled extruded profiles made of light metal, reducing material usage while maintaining structural integrity for the inclined arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The tops of the support profiles are rounded with a radius between 500 mm and 700 mm, allowing the PV module to rest tangentially and enabling the use of lighter, more efficient profile designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentEP3161390B1Inclined arrangement of PV modules on flat roofs
Publication Date: 2019.08.07 SCHLETTER INTERNATIONAL BV
  • EP3161390B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3161390B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3161390B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The inclined arrangement of PV modules on flat roofs comprises a front and rear support section (6, 7). Said sections are mounted in parallel on the flat roof by means of retaining elements (10a, 11a) that are fixed to the flat roof (1). The undersides of the support sections (6, 7) are positioned in parallel with the roof on the retaining elements. The upper sides of the support sections (6, 7) support a PV module (4) at an incline and at a shallow angle in relation to the flat roof (1), the rear support section (7) having a greater supporting height than the front support section (6). The inclined arrangement is particularly suitable for shallow angles of between 5 and 8°. Preferably, the upper sides of both support sections (6, 7) are rounded so that the PV module (4) lies tangentially or substantially tangentially on said sections. The support sections (6, 7) can thus give favourable structural support to PV modules of various sizes at various angles.