Photovoltaic MPPT Finite-State Machine Target Range Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing photovoltaic generators face inefficiencies in tracking the maximum power point due to current mismatches caused by partial shading and environmental changes, leading to energy losses as conventional MPPT techniques like Perturb-and-Observe may converge slowly or inaccurately, especially in concentration-type systems with rapidly varying power-voltage characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines a target range for the maximum power point by comparing relative critical mismatches between photovoltaic generator ranges, allowing for efficient tracking within this range, reducing the number of iterations and energy losses, and enabling fast and accurate convergence even under quick voltage changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If Perturb-and-Observe method is used for MPPT control, then the implementation is simple, but the convergence speed is slow and accuracy is reduced due to operating at relative power peaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidconvergence speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a preliminary search of the power-voltage characteristic curve before initiating the Perturb-and-Observe method. This search identifies the correct operating range and absolute maximum power point, allowing the subsequent MPPT algorithm to converge faster and more accurately without wasting time exploring incorrect regions of the curve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the power-voltage characteristic curve into multiple ranges based on relative power peaks. By dividing the search space into segments and identifying which segment contains the absolute maximum, the system can focus its MPPT efforts in the correct region, improving both convergence speed and accuracy while maintaining algorithmic simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If Perturb-and-Observe method is used with high frequency and low pitch displacements, then convergence accuracy improves, but convergence speed decreases and energy losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvergence accuracyVSAvoidconvergence time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the displacement frequency and pitch adaptive rather than fixed. The system dynamically adjusts these parameters based on the operating conditions and the stage of convergence. During preliminary search, higher frequency and larger pitch are used for fast exploration; during fine-tuning near the maximum, frequency is reduced and pitch is optimized for precision, thereby reducing overall convergence time and energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If search for maximum power point is performed whenever environmental conditions change substantially, then the maximum power point is accurately tracked, but considerable energy losses occur during the search

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum power point tracking accuracyVSAvoidenergy losses during search
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by focusing the search effort locally around the expected maximum power point region rather than performing a global search of the entire power-voltage curve. By using environmental condition data to predict the likely operating range and concentrating the search in this local region, the system achieves accurate tracking while minimizing the time and energy spent during search operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Duration of action of stationary object

If conventional MPPT techniques are used, then the system operates continuously, but energy losses occur due to operation away from the actual maximum power point

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidenergy losses from suboptimal operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing an initial comprehensive search and identification of the absolute maximum power point before starting continuous MPPT operation. This preliminary characterization of the power-voltage curve allows the system to establish accurate reference points and operating ranges, enabling subsequent continuous operation to remain consistently near the true maximum power point and thereby minimizing energy losses from suboptimal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces energy losses by quickly and accurately tracking the maximum power point, improving energy efficiency and mitigating errors caused by environmental variations, particularly in concentration photovoltaic systems.

Implementation Method 1

The photovoltaic generators are commonly used to convert light energy into electrical energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotovoltaic effect: Photovoltaic Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3249492B1Maximum power point tracking of a photovoltaic generator based on research of a target range
Publication Date: 2019.01.23 RICERCA SUL SISTEMA ENERGETICO - RSE
  • EP3249492B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3249492B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3249492B1 patent drawingFigure 2C~2D

AI summary

The invention pertains to a control logic of a photovoltaic generator for tracking its maximum power point. The control logic is performed by a finite-state machine. The finite-state machine starts a total searching procedure of a target range CRtarget in which the maximum power point occurs. The finite-state machine passes from the state 505 to a state 510 for determining a starting range CRstart, whose mismatch CRstart is lower than or equal to an absolute critical mismatch Mca. The finite-state machine passes from the state 510 to a state 515 for determining the mismatch Mstart of the starting range CRstart. The finite-state machine then passes from the state 515 to a state 520, during which the relative difference of the mismatches Mstart+d and Mstart is compared to the corresponding relative critical mismatch Mcr(d). If the relative difference of the mismatches Mstart+d and Mstart is lower than the relative critical mismatch Mcr(d), the starting range CRstart is moved to the following range CRstart+d and the finite-state machine returns to the state 515 to repeat the same operations, until the target range is identified.