PV Cell Parameter Identification Using IEO and BP Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing photovoltaic cell parameter identification methods struggle with inaccurate results and are prone to local optima, especially under changing operating conditions and limited measurement data.

Innovation Solution

A photovoltaic cell parameter identification method using an improved equilibrium optimizer (IEO) algorithm, which includes establishing a PV cell model, utilizing a BP neural network for data prediction, and employing a root mean square error (RMSE) as an objective function, along with an IEO algorithm for parameter identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If deterministic methods are used for parameter identification, then identification accuracy is improved, but the method becomes sensitive to initial conditions and gradient information, making it easy to be trapped into local optimum

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter identification accuracyVSAvoidconvergence to global optimum
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm performs preliminary actions by maintaining a population of candidate solutions and pre-calculating equilibrium positions before the main optimization process. This allows the algorithm to explore multiple potential optimal points simultaneously, reducing the risk of getting trapped in local optima while maintaining high identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The equilibrium optimizer algorithm introduces dynamic behavior by simulating the natural equilibrium process where particles continuously adjust their positions based on balance between exploration and exploitation phases. This dynamic adaptation allows the algorithm to escape local optima and converge to global optimum more reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If analysis method is used for parameter identification, then structural simplicity is improved, but identification accuracy deteriorates under changing operating environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod structure simplicityVSAvoidparameter identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical calculation methods with an intelligent optimization algorithm that uses equilibrium concepts. This substitution maintains relative structural simplicity while dramatically improving identification accuracy under changing operating conditions through adaptive search mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm dynamically changes parameters during the optimization process, adjusting exploration and exploitation rates based on iteration progress. This parameter adaptation allows the method to maintain simplicity while achieving high accuracy across varying operating environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If deterministic methods are used for parameter identification, then identification accuracy is improved, but computation time increases due to strict model characteristics requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm applies partial action by using a subset of available data for each iteration's equilibrium calculation, rather than processing all data exhaustively. This approach maintains high identification accuracy while significantly reducing computation time per iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization process uses periodic action by alternating between exploration and exploitation phases, and between different equilibrium calculation steps. This periodic structure allows the algorithm to achieve high accuracy through multiple coarse-to-fine refinement cycles rather than requiring excessive computation in a single pass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12536422B2Photovoltaic cell parameter identification method based on improved equilibrium optimizer algorithm
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 GUIZHOU POWER GRID CO LTD
  • US12536422B2 patent drawing
  • US12536422B2 patent drawing
  • US12536422B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention discloses a method of photovoltaic cell parameter identification based on the improved equilibrium optimizer algorithm, which comprises: step 1, establishing PV cell model and fitness function; step 2, based on the measured output I-V data, predicting output data of PV cell by a BP neural network; step 3, identifying PV cell parameters by using IEO algorithm until convergence conditions of the IEO algorithm are reached, and finally outputting the optimal identified parameters. Solving technical problems of the existing technology such as, cannot reach the optimal parameter identification, and being easy to be trapped into the local optimal.