Segmented Safety Switches for PV Voltage Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Photovoltaic systems face challenges in safely managing voltage levels during unsafe conditions, requiring disconnecting or short-circuiting PV generators while ensuring compliance with changing safety regulations, and existing solutions are not cost-effective or easily deployable.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a controllable safety switch system that can be deployed between PV generators, with auxiliary power circuits and communication devices to monitor and control voltage levels, allowing for safe operation by disconnecting or short-circuiting PV generators as needed, and can be retrofitted into existing systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If safety switches are deployed between PV generators to maintain safe voltage levels, then safety compliance is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety complianceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the PV installation into segments with individual safety switches deployed between PV generators. Each safety switch independently controls voltage levels in its segment, allowing localized safety management without requiring system-wide complexity. This segmentation enables compliance with safety regulations while maintaining manageable system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Safety switches serve as intermediary devices between PV generators, actively controlling voltage levels by disconnecting or short-circuiting generators as needed. These intermediary components simplify the overall safety management by providing a dedicated mechanism for voltage control, rather than requiring complex system-wide monitoring and control infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If safety switches are added to comply with future regulations, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation compliance adaptabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The safety switch system is designed to be dynamically configurable, allowing the number and placement of switches to be adjusted based on current and future safety regulations. This dynamic adaptability enables the system to comply with evolving regulations without requiring complete system redesign, thereby controlling manufacturing costs while maintaining regulatory compliance flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The safety switches are designed as universal components that can be deployed in various configurations to meet different regulatory requirements. This multi-functionality allows a single component design to serve multiple compliance scenarios, reducing the need for specialized components for each regulation level and thereby controlling manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If safety switches are deployed in all locations, then safety coverage is improved, but installation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses segmentation to deploy safety switches at strategically chosen locations between PV generators rather than at every possible point. This segmented approach provides comprehensive safety coverage by dividing the system into manageable segments, each protected by individual switches, while avoiding the installation complexity of universal deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If auxiliary power circuits are added to power safety switches, then operational reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The auxiliary power circuits are designed to automatically power the safety switches using energy harvested from the PV system itself. This self-service approach ensures operational reliability by providing continuous power to safety switches without requiring external power sources or complex power management infrastructure, thereby minimizing device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3291309B1Safety switch for photovoltaic systems
Publication Date: 2022.08.24 SOLAREDGE TECH LTD
  • EP3291309B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3291309B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3291309B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Various implementations described herein are directed to a methods and apparatuses for disconnecting, by a device, elements at certain parts of an electrical system. The method may include measuring operational parameters at certain locations within the system and/or receiving messages from control devices indicating a potentially unsafe condition, disconnecting and/or short-circuiting system elements in response, and reconnection the system elements when it is safe to do so. Certain embodiments relate to methods and apparatuses for providing operational power to safety switches during different modes of system operation.