Physical Vapor Deposition Dome Angle Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing physical vapor deposition processes face challenges in achieving uniform thickness distribution of material layers on substrates held by a rotating dome, particularly for thick antireflective layers like ZrO2, with substrates near the periphery often having less material than those near the center.

Innovation Solution

A process involving a dome rotation axis with substrates at varying distances, using an energy beam to evaporate material from a target with a specific angle between the dome rotation axis and the main diffusion axis, optimizing the angle between +5° to +40° or -5° to -40° to ensure uniform layer thickness across all substrates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If substrates are arranged on a rotating dome for physical vapor deposition, then multiple substrates can be coated simultaneously, but the thickness distribution of the material layer becomes non-uniform across substrates at different positions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidthickness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adjusting the deposition conditions for different regions of the dome. Specifically, substrates at different radial positions (internal vs external) receive different amounts of material flux by controlling the evaporation geometry and angle, ensuring that each region receives the appropriate material quantity to achieve uniform thickness across all substrates simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the deposition system, specifically the angle between the dome rotation axis and the main diffusion axis of evaporated material (optimized at +5° to +40° or -5° to -40°), and the distance of substrates from the rotation axis. These parameter adjustments compensate for the natural radial variation in material flux during rotation, enabling uniform thickness distribution while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If the energy beam evaporates material from the target, then material is deposited on substrates, but thickness homogeneity between interior and exterior substrates cannot be easily obtained for thick layers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial thicknessVSAvoidthickness homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetry in the deposition geometry by positioning the target and substrates at specific asymmetric angles relative to the dome rotation axis. The angle between the dome rotation axis and the main diffusion axis is optimized at +5° to +40° or -5° to -40°, creating an asymmetric material flux distribution that compensates for the radial position differences between internal and external substrates, achieving uniform thickness even for thick layers (≥50nm, particularly for ZrO2)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a angular dimension to the deposition control by varying the angle α between the dome rotation axis and the main diffusion axis. This angular parameter provides an additional degree of freedom to control material distribution, allowing independent optimization of thickness uniformity across different radial positions on the rotating dome

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process ensures uniform thickness of material layers on both internal and external substrates, as demonstrated by successful deposition of ZrO2 layers on ophthalmic spectacle lenses, achieving satisfactory thickness homogeneity and chromaticity similarity across the dome.

Implementation Method 1

The material to be deposited is vacuum evaporated thanks to an energy beam from a target which is made of said material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum evaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

Physical Vapor Deposition is a well-known process performed under vacuum in which a target consisting of a material is bombarded with an energy beam. The energy beam causes atoms from the target to transform into the gaseous phase. These atoms then precipitate into solid form, coating simultaneously the plurality of substrates in a vacuum chamber with a layer of the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentEP3169823B1A process for physical vapor deposition of a material layer on surfaces of a plurality of substrates
Publication Date: 2020.10.14 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)
  • EP3169823B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3169823B1 patent drawingFigure 1b~2
  • EP3169823B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process of physical vapor deposition of a material layer on surfaces of a plurality of substrates (11), wherein: - the plurality of substrates (11) are arranged on a dome (12) which rotates according to a dome rotation axis (300); - the material to be deposited is vacuum evaporated thanks to an energy beam from a target (13); - the energy beam interacts with a beam impact surface of the target chosen within the list consisting of a part of a main surface (15) and a part of an edge (14) of the target and wherein the material diffuses from the target to the substrates around a main diffusion axis (100) which intersects the dome (12) at an intersection point, I; and - the angle α between the dome rotation axis (300) and the main diffusion axis (100) is chosen within the ranges of +5° to +40° or -5° to -40°.