PWM Modulator Pulse Skipping Prevention Low Duty Cycle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Voltage regulators experience pulse skipping at low duty cycle operations due to noise and non-idealities, which can lead to instability and inefficiency, particularly when the output voltage is near the minimum voltage level, and existing solutions increase board costs by adding components.

Innovation Solution

A PWM modulator system that includes a variable high pass filter and a modified ramp slew rate mechanism to maintain the error voltage at a consistent DC level, preventing pulse skipping by compensating for gain reduction and ensuring dynamic response without degrading performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If traditional PWM control is used at low duty cycle operations, then the voltage regulator can operate at minimum voltage levels, but pulse skipping occurs due to noise and non-idealities causing instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage levelVSAvoidcontrol stability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by introducing a feedforward mechanism that anticipates and counteracts the gain reduction effect before it causes pulse skipping. The feedforward path modifies the PWM signal in advance to compensate for the expected gain change at low duty cycles, preventing the control voltage from dropping below the ramp signal and thus avoiding pulse skipping events before they can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by monitoring the actual PWM signal and control voltage levels, and using this information to adjust the feedforward compensation dynamically. The feedback mechanism detects when gain reduction is occurring and modulates the feedforward signal accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that maintains stability while operating at low duty cycles near minimum voltage levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If additional components are added to prevent pulse skipping, then control stability improves, but board cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidcomponent count
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the pulse skipping prevention function with the existing PWM modulator circuitry by integrating a feedforward compensation path that shares components with the regular PWM generation. The compensation mechanism uses existing capacitors, resistors, and operational amplifiers in a dual-purpose configuration, eliminating the need for separate dedicated components and reducing overall board complexity while maintaining control stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by designing the feedforward compensation circuit to serve multiple functions: it prevents pulse skipping at low duty cycles, maintains PWM signal integrity across the full operating range, and works seamlessly with the existing feedback regulation loop. This multi-functional approach allows a single circuit implementation to address multiple control challenges without requiring specialized components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If gain reduction is compensated to prevent pulse skipping, then regulation performance improves, but dynamic response may be degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation performanceVSAvoiddynamic response
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the feedforward compensation signal adaptive rather than fixed. The compensation amount dynamically adjusts based on the operating conditions and detected gain reduction levels, allowing the system to optimize between regulation performance and dynamic response in real-time. This dynamic adjustment prevents the compensation from becoming overly aggressive, which would slow down the response, while still providing sufficient correction to prevent pulse skipping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes periodic action through the oscillating nature of the PWM ramp signal, synchronizing the feedforward compensation with the PWM switching cycles. The compensation is applied in a periodic manner that aligns with the natural rhythm of the PWM operation, ensuring that corrections are made at appropriate moments in the switching cycle without introducing phase delays that would degrade dynamic response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS8723500B2System and method for preventing controller induced pulse skipping at low duty cycle operations
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 INTERSIL AMERICAS INC
  • US8723500B2 patent drawing
  • US8723500B2 patent drawing
  • US8723500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A voltage regulator generates a regulated output voltage responsive to an input voltage and drive control signals. An error amplifier generates an error voltage signal responsive to the regulated output voltage and a reference voltage. A PWM modulator generates a PWM control signal responsive to the error voltage signal, a ramp voltage and an inverse of the reference voltage. Control circuitry within the PWM modulator maintains the error voltage signal applied to the PWM modulator at substantially a same DC voltage level over the reference voltage operating range and maintains the error voltage signal above a minimum value of the ramp voltage. Driver circuitry generates the drive control signals responsive to the PWM control signal.