PWR Reactor Stretchout Control via Coolant Temperature

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

During the 'stretchout' phase of a pressurized water nuclear reactor, where boron concentration is low, conventional control methods struggle to maintain reactor stability and maneuverability due to axial xenon oscillations and limited power regulation, restricting the ability to adjust power in response to electrical energy consumption variations and requiring increased operator surveillance.

Innovation Solution

A method that controls the axial distribution of power through control rod cluster movements while allowing the mean temperature of the primary coolant to vary freely within a defined range, rather than adhering to a reference temperature profile, enabling more flexible power management and compensation for xenon growth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional control methods are used during stretchout phase, then reactor stability is maintained, but maneuverability and power regulation capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor stabilityVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from static control (fixed reference temperature profile) to dynamic control (adaptive temperature profile that varies based on real-time reactor conditions). The control system continuously adjusts the temperature profile based on measured parameters, enabling the reactor to respond dynamically to load variations and xenon oscillations while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameter from a fixed reference temperature profile to a variable temperature profile that adapts to changing reactor conditions. By allowing the setpoint temperature to vary based on actual measurements and reactor state, the system gains maneuverability without sacrificing stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Temperature

If reference temperature profile is followed during stretchout, then temperature control is maintained, but power adjustment capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemean temperature controlVSAvoidpower adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the temperature profile based on real-time reactor conditions rather than following a predetermined fixed profile. This enables the system to adapt power output to match electrical energy consumption variations while maintaining appropriate temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements feedback control where the actual reactor temperature and power measurements are continuously compared with desired values, and the control actions are adjusted based on the deviations. This feedback mechanism enables both temperature control and power adjustment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If control rod cluster movements are avoided during stretchout, then axial xenon oscillations are controlled, but power regulation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial power distribution stabilityVSAvoidpower regulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses the primary coolant temperature as an intermediary control parameter to achieve power regulation without moving control rod clusters. By adjusting the coolant temperature, the system indirectly controls reactor power and compensates for xenon growth, maintaining axial power distribution stability while enabling power regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical control rod cluster movement system with a thermal control system that uses coolant temperature adjustment. This substitution eliminates the need for control rod movements during stretchout while maintaining power regulation capability through thermal means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Power

If boron concentration is reduced to near zero during stretchout, then reactivity compensation is achieved, but control flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactivity compensationVSAvoidcontrol flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the control parameter from boron concentration (which is fixed near zero during stretchout) to primary coolant temperature. By making temperature the active control parameter instead of boron concentration, the system achieves reactivity compensation while maintaining control flexibility through temperature adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances reactor maneuverability and power regulation during the 'stretchout' phase, allowing for maximum power exploitation and improved frequency adjustments, reducing the need for control rod cluster movements and enabling longer operation at maximum power without adhering to a fixed temperature profile.

Implementation Method 1

a primary circuit with a core producing thermal power and a steam generator heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

a steam generator heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

steam generator heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS10847276B2Method for controlling a pressurized water nuclear reactor during stretchout
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 AREVA NP SAS
  • US10847276B2 patent drawing
  • US10847276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a pressurized water nuclear reactor is provided, including core producing thermal power, sensors for acquiring the mean temperature of the primary coolant and for calculating the thermal power, actuators for controlling the axial distribution of power, the control method including:a first control phase for controlling the reactor during normal operation by controlling the mean temperature of the primary coolant so as to make it correspond to a reference temperature profile (Pref) dependent on the thermal power of the reactor; anda second control phase, referred to as stretchout, that occurs after normal operation of the reactor in order to control the reactor in stretchout by controlling the axial distribution of power, the mean temperature varying freely in a temperature range delimited by an upper limit and a lower limit.