Aircraft Engine Pylon Torque Box Load Path Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft engine mounting structures, such as truss frames, face challenges in efficiently transferring engine loads while maintaining structural integrity and minimizing weight, particularly in the event of an uncontained engine rotor failure, and often complicate propeller drive shaft alignment and maintenance access.

Innovation Solution

A pylon structure comprising a torque box with wing mounts, first and second engine mounts, connecting rods, and thrust links, which forms a load path through a skeletal frame and stressed skins to direct engine loads into the wing, providing a structurally efficient and resistant design that reduces the distance between the engine output and propeller drive shaft, and allows for easier maintenance access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional truss frame mounting structures are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but weight increases and structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmounting structure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting structure is divided into discrete functional components including engine mounts, torque box, connecting rods, and thrust links. Each component performs a specific function in the load path, allowing for optimized design of individual elements rather than a monolithic truss structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The torque box is extracted as a separate functional element from the traditional truss structure. This torque box serves as a dedicated component for resisting engine torque while the remaining structure handles other loads, enabling more efficient structural design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Strength

If traditional truss frame mounting structures are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmounting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting structure is divided into discrete functional components including engine mounts, torque box, connecting rods, and thrust links. Each component performs a specific function in the load path, allowing for optimized design of individual elements rather than a monolithic truss structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The torque box serves multiple functions: it resists engine torque, provides a mounting structure for the engine, and integrates with the wing mounting system. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If the torque box is located below the engine, then structural support is simplified, but propeller aerodynamics deteriorate and maintenance access becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural support simplicityVSAvoidmaintenance access
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of placing the torque box below the engine as in conventional designs, the torque box is inverted to a position above the engine. This inversion improves propeller aerodynamics by clearing the propeller arc and enhances maintenance access to the engine and propeller drive shaft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The torque box is repositioned from a vertical arrangement (below engine) to a horizontal arrangement (above engine along the longitudinal axis). This dimensional change allows the propeller to rotate in clear space while maintaining structural support functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If the distance between engine output and propeller drive shaft is increased, then structural support is simplified, but propeller aerodynamics and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural support simplicityVSAvoidpropeller efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of placing the torque box below the engine as in conventional designs, the torque box is inverted to a position above the engine. This inversion improves propeller aerodynamics by clearing the propeller arc and enhances maintenance access to the engine and propeller drive shaft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The torque box is positioned above the engine in advance of the propeller rotation arc, allowing the propeller to rotate without interference while maintaining a compact overall structure that preserves propeller efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3114030B1Engine pylon structure
Publication Date: 2023.09.13 MRA SYST LLC
  • EP3114030B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3114030B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3114030B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A pylon structure (10) for mounting an aircraft engine to a wing. The pylon structure comprises a torque box (12) having a wing mount (14) on the aft portion, a first engine mount (16) on the fore portion and second engine mount (18) on the aft portion.