Biomass Pyrolysis Oil Disaggregation via Oxidative Esterification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for upgrading pyrolysis oil (PO) to produce fungible renewable fuels face challenges such as high hydrogen consumption, capital and variable costs, corrosion, catalyst fouling, and instability due to high oxygen content and water content, limiting large-scale production and commercial applications.

Innovation Solution

A process involving pre-treatment of PO with oxidizing agents followed by esterification with alcohols and catalysts to achieve phase separation, resulting in a high-density hydrophobic aromatic fraction (HAF) and aqueous phase for further processing, which reduces water content and improves stability and calorific value.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydrodeoxygenation or hydrocracking is used to upgrade PO, then fuel quality is improved, but hydrogen consumption becomes very high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel qualityVSAvoidhydrogen consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The upgrading process is divided into multiple stages: pre-treatment stage to remove water and stabilize PO, followed by selective upgrading stages. This segmentation allows targeted treatment of specific components (water removal before fuel upgrading) to reduce overall hydrogen consumption while maintaining fuel quality improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A pre-treatment stage is implemented before the main upgrading process to remove water and stabilize the PO. This preliminary action prepares the PO for more efficient subsequent upgrading, reducing the hydrogen required in later stages while still achieving the desired fuel quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If two-stage hydroprocessing is used, then fuel quality is improved, but capital cost and reaction time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel qualityVSAvoidcapital cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process is segmented into a pre-treatment stage (water removal and stabilization) followed by selective upgrading stages. This allows the first stage to handle water removal separately, enabling the second stage to focus on fuel upgrading with potentially simpler equipment and reduced capital costs compared to conventional two-stage hydroprocessing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process uses different operational parameters for different stages: pre-treatment at milder conditions for water removal, followed by controlled upgrading conditions. This parameter optimization can reduce the severity and complexity of equipment required in each stage, potentially lowering capital costs while maintaining fuel quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If PO is used as fuel, then environmental benefits are achieved, but stability and compatibility with conventional fuels deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental benefitsVSAvoidfuel stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A pre-treatment stage is implemented to remove water and stabilize the PO composition before it is used as fuel or blended with conventional fuels. This preliminary stabilization action addresses the stability and compatibility issues while preserving the environmental benefits of using renewable PO fuel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The process modifies key parameters of PO (water content, oxygen content, molecular structure) through controlled chemical and physical treatment. These parameter changes improve stability and compatibility with conventional fuels while maintaining the renewable and environmentally beneficial characteristics of the fuel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If PO is stored for prolonged periods, then flexibility is improved, but phase separation and viscosity increase occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage flexibilityVSAvoidphase stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The PO undergoes pre-treatment to remove water and stabilize its composition before storage. This preliminary action prevents phase separation and viscosity increase during prolonged storage, allowing flexible storage while maintaining phase stability and compositional consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The process modifies PO parameters (water content, molecular structure, viscosity) through controlled treatment to create a more stable product. These parameter changes prevent phase separation during storage while maintaining flexibility in storage duration and conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process enables low-cost, low-energy phase separation of PO into high-value products like HAF, pyrolytic sugars, and phenolic monomers, reducing water content and improving stability and fuel properties, thus overcoming the limitations of existing technologies.

Implementation Method 1

pre-treating the PO with one or more oxidizing agents in a reactor to form a product mixture comprising an oxidized product by converting aldehyde and ketone groups to acids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

contacting the oxidised product with one or more alcohol species with an esterification catalyst in a reactor under reaction conditions sufficient to produce phase separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEsterification: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

produce phase separation of the treated PO

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Implementation Method 4

the organic phase of the phase separated product after the esterification process is further vacuum distilled to recover the solvent as well as hydrophobic aromatic fraction (HAF)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 5

the aqueous phase of the phase separated product after the esterification process is further processed by liquid-liquid extraction with solvents to extract and recover pyrolytic sugars and mono phenolics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Data Source

PatentUS11781077B2Disaggregation of biomass pyrolysis oil
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 ALDER ENERGY LLC
  • US11781077B2 patent drawing
  • US11781077B2 patent drawing
  • US11781077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a novel process for disaggregating biomass pyrolysis oil quantitatively into energy dense hydrophobic aromatic fraction (HAF), fermentable pyrolytic sugars and phenolics based products in a highly economical and energy efficient manner. Phase separation of the esterified pyrolysis oil after an oxidative pre-treatment and the quantitative recovery of the separate fractions is described. Phase separation uses batch as well as continuous reactor systems. The resulting HAF is an energy dense, thermally stable, water free, non-corrosive to carbon steel, and is a free flowing liquid suitable for combustion and for upgrading to transportation fuels. Pyrolytic sugars which are mainly anhydrosugars can be further converted by fermentation to ethanol or other products. Monomeric phenols are useful industrial intermediates and the organic acids in the original pyrolysis oil are mainly recovered as esters of the separation solvents.