Pyrolysis Oil Upgrading via Segmented Hydrodeoxygenation and Pre-Reforming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pyrolysis oils are chemically and thermally unstable, leading to phase separation and coking issues during steam reforming, limiting their valorization in refineries, and high hydrogen consumption in hydrodeoxygenation processes hinders sustainability goals.

Innovation Solution

A process involving hydrodeoxygenation followed by pre-reforming of the aqueous fraction and hydrotreatment/catalytic cracking of the lignin-rich fraction to produce hydrogen and fuel bases, reducing hydrogen consumption and coking problems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If pyrolysis oil is directly used in refinery applications, then the process is simple, but the oil's chemical and thermal instability causes phase separation and coking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidoil stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing stabilization treatment on pyrolysis oil before refinery processing. The oil undergoes hydrodeoxygenation and catalytic cracking in advance to eliminate reactive species, prevent phase separation, and remove coking precursors, ensuring stable operation in downstream refinery units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful high oxygen content (40-60% m/m) and chemical instability of pyrolysis oil into beneficial outcomes. Through hydrodeoxygenation, the excess oxygen is removed as water, stabilizing the oil. The same unstable reactive species that cause coking are transformed into stable hydrocarbon products through catalytic cracking, turning potential problems into quality improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If hydrodeoxygenation is performed to stabilize pyrolysis oil, then oil stability improves, but hydrogen consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil stabilityVSAvoidhydrogen consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the stabilization process into two distinct stages: first, hydrodeoxygenation to remove excess oxygen and achieve basic stability; second, catalytic cracking to remove remaining reactive species and coking precursors. This segmentation allows optimized hydrogen usage in each stage rather than requiring excessive hydrogen for complete stabilization in a single step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by conducting hydrodeoxygenation at moderate temperatures (150-350°C) and pressures (100-200 bars), then performing catalytic cracking at higher temperatures (400-600°C) with catalysts. These parameter optimizations reduce the total hydrogen requirement compared to conventional high-pressure hydrodeoxygenation alone, while achieving complete stabilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If steam reforming is applied to pyrolysis oil to produce hydrogen, then hydrogen production increases, but coking problems worsen due to oil instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen productionVSAvoidcoking
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary stabilization through hydrodeoxygenation and catalytic cracking before steam reforming. This preliminary action removes reactive oxygenated compounds and coking precursors from the pyrolysis oil, creating a stabilized feedstock that resists coking during the high-temperature steam reforming process, thereby enabling sustained hydrogen production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If pyrolysis oil is stabilized through extensive treatment to enable refinery use, then oil compatibility improves, but processing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil miscibility with hydrocarbonsVSAvoidprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the stabilization process into two optimized stages: hydrodeoxygenation to achieve basic stability and partial deoxygenation, followed by catalytic cracking to enhance compatibility with hydrocarbons. This segmentation allows flexible operation where the extent of each stage can be adjusted based on the desired level of miscibility, optimizing processing costs for different application requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the complete valorization of pyrolysis oils by producing hydrogen and fuel bases while minimizing hydrogen external supply and avoiding coking, thus aligning with sustainability criteria.

Implementation Method 1

a hydrodeoxygenation unit (HDO) (10), characterised in that it is followed by a pre-reforming unit (22) for treating a light aqueous fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodeoxygenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 2

a pre-reforming unit (22) for treating a light aqueous fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReforming: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 3

an SMR unit (28) for producing hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam methane reforming: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 4

a hydrotreatment unit (40) for treating a heavy organic fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrotreatment: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 5

hydrotreatment and/or catalytic cracking and/or visbreaking of said lignin-rich fraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic cracking: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentEP2467452B1Process for upgrading a pyrolysis oil, in particular in a refinery
Publication Date: 2016.10.19 TOTAL RAFFINAGE MARKETING
  • EP2467452B1 patent drawing
  • EP2467452B1 patent drawing
  • EP2467452B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for upgrading a pyrolysis oil comprising the following steps: - hydrodeoxygenation treatment (10) of the pyrolysis oil (12) and separation of the effluent (16) obtained into a light aqueous fraction (18) and a heavy organic fraction (20), or separation of the pyrolysis oil into an aqueous fraction and a lignin-rich fraction, - pre-reforming (22) of said aqueous fraction (18) and treatment of the effluent (26) obtained in an SMR unit (28) in order to produce hydrogen (34), - hydrotreatment (40) and/or catalytic cracking and/or visbreaking of said heavy organic fraction (20).