Pyrolysis Reactor Exhaust Gas Heating and CO Combustion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for gasifying lumpy fuels, such as those using pyrolysis reactors and gas engines, face inefficiencies in heat supply and high carbon monoxide levels in product gases, leading to suboptimal energy conversion and pollutant scavenging.

Innovation Solution

A system with a double-walled pyrolysis reactor and a post-combustion chamber, where exhaust gases from the gas engine are heated to increase temperature for efficient pyrolysis, and the post-combustion chamber ensures complete combustion of carbon monoxide, with staged gasification and separate optimization of reduction and post-combustion zones for improved efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If external heat supply is increased during pyrolysis to improve gasification efficiency, then energy conversion efficiency improves, but carbon monoxide concentration in product gas increases due to partial combustion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegasification efficiencyVSAvoidcarbon monoxide concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gasification process is divided into two distinct zones: a pyrolysis zone where biomass undergoes thermal decomposition without oxygen to produce syngas, and a separate combustion zone where carbon monoxide is burned. This spatial segmentation allows efficient heat supply to the pyrolysis zone while directing CO combustion to a dedicated area, resolving the contradiction between gasification efficiency and CO concentration control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A combustion zone acts as an intermediary between the pyrolysis reactor and the environment. This intermediate zone captures and combusts carbon monoxide from the product gas, serving as a mediator that removes the harmful CO while allowing the main pyrolysis process to operate efficiently at high temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If exhaust gases from gas engine are directly used for pyrolysis heating, then energy recovery is improved, but temperature is insufficient for efficient pyrolysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidpyrolysis temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges two heat sources: exhaust gases from the gas engine and additional fuel combustion in the combustion zone. The exhaust gases provide base heating while the combustion zone adds intensive heat to raise the temperature to levels required for efficient pyrolysis, combining energy recovery with temperature requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The temperature parameter of the heating gas is changed by introducing additional combustion in the combustion zone. This transforms the low-temperature exhaust gases into high-temperature heating media suitable for efficient pyrolysis, while maintaining the energy recovery benefit of using exhaust gases as a heat source

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-generated harmful factors

If post-combustion chamber is added to burn carbon monoxide, then pollutant emissions are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollutant emissionsVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The combustion zone serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides intensive heating for the pyrolysis process, combusts carbon monoxide to reduce emissions, and acts as a heat exchanger to transfer heat back to the pyrolysis reactor. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components, mitigating the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The combustion zone is arranged concentrically around the pyrolysis reactor, with the pyrolysis chamber nested within the combustion zone. This nested configuration allows the combustion zone to serve as both a pollutant control device and a heating device, achieving emission reduction without requiring a completely separate external combustion system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves high efficiency in gasification by minimizing external heat supply and complete combustion of carbon monoxide, enhancing energy conversion and reducing pollutant emissions.

Implementation Method 1

a pyrolysis reactor (2) and a gasifier (3), wherein the pyrolysis reactor (2) is used to pyrolyse the lumpy fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

the gasifier (3) is used to gasify the charcoal and the agent gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGasification:

Implementation Method 3

the post-combustion combustion chamber (7), in which the temperature of the exhaust gas from the gas engine (6) is increased

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP2808377B1Installation and process facility for gasifying lumpy fuels
Publication Date: 2016.11.16 CLEANSTGAS
  • EP2808377B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2808377B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2808377B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In a plant (1) for gasifying lumpy fuels with a pyrolysis reactor (2) and a gas engine (6), it is proposed that an exhaust gas outlet (65) of the gas engine (6) is connected to an inlet (71) of an afterburning combustion chamber (7), and that an exhaust gas outlet (75) of the afterburning combustion chamber (7) is connected to at least one fuel gas inlet (23) of the pyrolysis reactor (2).