Integrated Pyrolysis and Steam Cracking for Plastic Recycling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plastic recycling methods, such as mechanical recycling, face economic and qualitative limitations due to the need for extensive separation and cleaning of non-plastic materials, resulting in lower quality recycled plastics and high costs, while chemical recycling processes require separation of non-plastic materials and have not fully realized the economic potential of converting plastics back to monomers.

Innovation Solution

A process involving pyrolyzing plastic feed at high temperatures to produce a pyrolysis effluent stream, which is then passed to a steam cracking unit for separation into C5 and C4 hydrocarbon streams, allowing for the direct conversion of plastics into high-value hydrocarbon products with minimal sorting and cleaning requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If mechanical recycling is used to recycle plastics, then plastics can be remolded into new articles, but extensive separation and cleaning of non-plastic materials is required resulting in high costs and lower quality recycled plastics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycling process simplicityVSAvoidseparation and cleaning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical recycling system (sorting, washing, melting) with a chemical recycling system using pyrolysis. The pyrolysis reactor thermally decomposes plastic waste into pyrolysis oil and gas products, eliminating the need for mechanical separation and cleaning equipment. This substitution resolves the contradiction by simplifying the manufacturing process while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental processing parameters from mechanical operations to thermal-chemical parameters. By operating at temperatures of 350-600°C in the pyrolysis reactor, the plastic feedstock undergoes thermal decomposition rather than mechanical processing. This parameter change enables direct conversion of mixed plastic waste into valuable hydrocarbon products without requiring separation or cleaning steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If plastic articles are separated into different plastics before melting, then quality of molded articles is maintained, but expense of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearticle qualityVSAvoidprocess cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies homogeneity by treating all plastic types uniformly through pyrolysis. Instead of separating different plastic types to maintain quality, the thermal decomposition process converts all plastics into similar pyrolysis products (oil and gas). This eliminates the need for sorting infrastructure and reduces manufacturing costs while maintaining product quality through consistent chemical conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical sorting system with a chemical conversion system. The pyrolysis reactor serves as a universal processor that handles mixed plastic waste without requiring pre-separation. This substitution resolves the contradiction by eliminating expensive sorting operations while producing consistent quality hydrocarbon products suitable for various applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If pyrolysis is used to convert plastics to liquids, then cleaning and sorting requirements are reduced, but additional refining steps are required to produce fuels and petrochemicals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedstock preparation simplicityVSAvoidrefining process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the pyrolysis process with existing steam cracking infrastructure. The pyrolysis effluent is directly fed into the steam cracking unit, combining two processing stages into an integrated system. This merging reduces the need for separate refining equipment and simplifies the overall process while maintaining the ability to produce high-value fuels and petrochemicals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-functional system where the pyrolysis reactor serves both as a waste treatment unit and a feedstock generation unit. The produced pyrolysis oil and gas can be used as fuel or further processed into petrochemicals. This universality reduces the need for dedicated refining equipment and allows flexible product distribution based on market conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If higher temperature pyrolysis is used to convert plastics directly to monomers, then circular recycling is achieved, but economic viability has not been fully realized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonomer conversion efficiencyVSAvoideconomic viability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes pyrolysis parameters (temperature, residence time, heating rate) to maximize monomer yield while controlling operating costs. By operating at 350-600°C with optimized residence times, the process achieves high monomer conversion efficiency while maintaining economic viability through reduced energy consumption and simplified equipment requirements compared to higher temperature processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the pyrolysis process to be self-sufficient by using the produced pyrolysis gas as fuel for the pyrolysis reactor itself. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external energy sources, reduces operating costs, and improves economic viability while maintaining high monomer conversion efficiency. The system essentially fuels itself, making the circular recycling process economically sustainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process effectively recycles plastics into valuable hydrocarbon products, reducing the need for additional cracking and preserving light olefins, thereby achieving a circular economy for plastics recycling with improved economic viability and quality of recycled materials.

Implementation Method 1

pyrolyzing a plastic feed at a temperature of at least 450° C. in a pyrolysis reactor to obtain a plastic pyrolysis effluent stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

passing the plastic pyrolysis effluent stream to a steam cracking unit to obtain a steam cracked effluent stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSteam cracking: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS11572511B2Integrated process for pyrolysis and steam cracking
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 UOP LLC
  • US11572511B2 patent drawing
  • US11572511B2 patent drawing
  • US11572511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for converting pyrolysis effluent stream into hydrocarbon products. Waste plastics are pyrolyzed at high temperature in a pyrolysis reactor to obtain a plastic pyrolysis effluent stream. The plastic pyrolysis effluent stream is further sent to a steam cracking unit for the separation of plastic pyrolysis effluent stream into a C5+ hydrocarbon stream and a C4 hydrocarbon stream. The pyrolysis reactor is operated at a to obtain hydrocarbon products of high value.