Integrated Quality Assurance Brokerage System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quality assurance systems face challenges in efficiently coordinating multiple service providers to address service issues, leading to wasted time and resources due to the complexity of internal and external resource coordination, and the need for separate programs and databases for each entity.

Innovation Solution

A system with a universal database and standardized interfaces that allows for event reporting and coordination of service issues across multiple service providers, enabling communication between providers and customers, and facilitating the solicitation of support from other providers to address service issues, while also collecting customer feedback for improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple service providers use separate programs and databases to coordinate service issues, then each entity can maintain its own data and processes, but the coordination complexity increases and resource efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice issue resolution reliabilityVSAvoidcoordination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple service providers' separate programs and databases into a single centralized quality assurance system. This centralization allows all service providers to coordinate through one unified platform, reducing the complexity of managing multiple separate systems while improving reliability through standardized processes and shared data access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The quality assurance system is designed as a universal platform that can handle service issues across multiple different service providers simultaneously. The system provides multi-functional capabilities including event reporting, resource coordination, communication facilitation, and feedback collection, all through a single standardized interface that adapts to various service provider needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If service providers coordinate internal and external resources manually to address service issues, then flexibility in resource allocation is maintained, but time and resources are wasted due to coordination complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice issue resolution efficiencyVSAvoidcoordination time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The quality assurance system acts as an intermediary platform between service providers and their resources (both internal and external). It automates the coordination process by matching service issues with appropriate resources through standardized interfaces, eliminating manual coordination efforts and significantly reducing the time required to allocate and deploy resources effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing standardized interfaces and data formats for resource coordination. Service providers can report events and request resources through predefined protocols, allowing the system to automatically process and route requests without ad-hoc negotiation, thereby reducing coordination time and improving resolution efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If a centralized system is used to coordinate service providers, then coordination efficiency improves and resource waste reduces, but the system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource coordination efficiencyVSAvoidsystem implementation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized quality assurance system is segmented into modular functional components including event reporting modules, resource coordination modules, communication facilitation modules, and feedback collection modules. Each module operates independently through standardized interfaces, allowing the system to be implemented incrementally and reducing the overall complexity of deployment while maintaining high coordination efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8838745B2Systems, methods and machine-readable mediums for integrated quality assurance brokering services
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US8838745B2 patent drawing
  • US8838745B2 patent drawing
  • US8838745B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods and machine-readable mediums for interfacing a plurality of service providers to address at least one service issue are provided. The systems may include a storage device and a processor. The storage device may store service provider data and service request data for a plurality of service providers. The service request data identifies at least one service issue with one or more of the plurality of service providers. The processor may be programmed to receive the service provider data from a plurality of service provider terminals, receive the service request data from at least one remote terminal, store the service provider data and the service request data in the storage device, and facilitate communication between the first service provider terminal and the customer terminal to address the at least one service issue. The computer readable mediums provide instructions to cause the processor to perform the operations above.