Quality Assurance for Example-Based Systems via Input Space Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Example-based systems, such as neural networks, face challenges in quality assurance due to their opaque nature, lack of verification, and uncertainty in determining the number of examples needed across the input space, leading to potential differences between training and application datasets, which can impact their reliability and security, especially in safety-critical applications.

Innovation Solution

A method for quality assurance that involves determining and comparing quality ratings representing the coverage of the input space by example sets, using distribution-based mappings to guide targeted example acquisition, and employing statistical measures to assess and improve the quality of example sets, ensuring consistent and reliable knowledge bases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If example-based systems are used without verification and inspection, then the system development is simpler and faster, but the reliability and security of the system deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem development speedVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing quality rating determination and input space coverage analysis before the example-based system is deployed or further developed. The method calculates quality ratings for example sets and compares them to identify potential issues early in the development process, allowing verification without slowing down the overall development timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the number of examples collected across the input space is increased, then the coverage and reliability of the example-based system improves, but the time and resources required for example acquisition increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput space coverageVSAvoidexample acquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by calculating quality ratings that represent the coverage of the input space by examples. These quality ratings are compared between different example sets to provide feedback on whether additional examples are needed and where gaps exist in the input space coverage, enabling targeted example acquisition rather than random collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by analyzing the distribution of examples across different regions of the input space. The quality rating comparison identifies specific areas where coverage is insufficient, allowing focused acquisition of examples in those local regions rather than uniformly increasing examples across the entire input space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If example sets are acquired in multiple iterative steps, then the acquisition process becomes more manageable and adaptable, but differences between example sets may occur that affect system consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition process flexibilityVSAvoidexample set consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback by comparing quality ratings between example sets acquired at different iterative steps. This comparison provides feedback on whether the example sets are consistent in terms of input space coverage, allowing the acquisition process to be adjusted to maintain consistency while preserving the flexibility of iterative acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230289606A1Quality assurance method for an example-based system
Publication Date: 2023.09.14 SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH
  • US20230289606A1 patent drawing
  • US20230289606A1 patent drawing
  • US20230289606A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A quality assurance method for an example-based system improves quality assurance by creating and training the example-based system based on collected examples forming an example set. The respective example in the example set includes an input value in an input space. A first example set including a plurality of examples and a second example set including a plurality of examples are collected. A first quality rating representing coverage of the input space by the examples in the first example set is determined based on distribution of the input values in the input space. A second quality rating representing coverage of the input space by the examples in the second example set is determined based on distribution of the input values in the input space. The first and second quality ratings are compared to one another. A computer program and a computer-readable storage medium are also provided.