Question Answering System Follow-on Inquiries for Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Question answering systems often produce incorrect responses due to missing information and marginal evidence, leading to low confidence scores and inefficiencies in providing accurate answers.

Innovation Solution

The system generates follow-on inquiries to external sources to gather missing information, which is then validated and integrated into the QA system to enhance confidence scores and improve answer accuracy by using crowd sourcing and external expert communities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the QA system uses pre-structured databases or document collections to answer questions, then the system can provide automated answers, but the system produces incorrect responses due to missing information and marginal evidence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated question answeringVSAvoidanswer accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates follow-on inquiries based on failures in answering original questions, uses responses from these inquiries to improve the corpus of data, and continuously refines the QA system's knowledge base. This feedback loop transforms incorrect answers into learning opportunities, systematically improving reliability while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively identifies missing information and generates follow-on inquiries before finalizing answers. By anticipating knowledge gaps and seeking additional information in advance, the system prevents incorrect answers from being produced in the first place, improving reliability while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the QA system generates follow-on inquiries to external sources, then the accuracy of answers is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary layer of follow-on inquiries that mediates between the QA system and external knowledge sources. Instead of directly accessing complex external databases, the system generates simplified inquiry representations that can be answered by external sources, then integrates these answers back into the corpus. This intermediary approach improves accuracy while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the knowledge acquisition process into distinct components: identifying missing information, generating follow-on inquiries, receiving responses from external sources, and integrating answers into the corpus. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving overall accuracy while keeping individual components manageable in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system uses marginal evidence to generate candidate answers, then the system can provide answers with limited information, but the confidence scores remain low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer generation capabilityVSAvoidconfidence score
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses responses from follow-on inquiries as feedback to refine and re-score candidate answers. By iteratively seeking additional evidence through follow-on inquiries and using these responses to update confidence scores, the system transforms low-confidence answers based on marginal evidence into high-confidence answers backed by robust evidence, while maintaining the ability to generate answers from limited initial information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9165252B2Utilizing failures in question and answer system responses to enhance the accuracy of question and answer systems
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9165252B2 patent drawing
  • US9165252B2 patent drawing
  • US9165252B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized device for enhancing the accuracy of a question-answer system is disclosed. The computerized device comprises a question-answer system comprising software for performing a plurality of question answering processes. A receiver receives a question into the question-answer system. A processor that generates a plurality of candidate answers to the question is connected to the question-answer system. The processor determines a confidence score for each of the plurality of candidate answers. The processor evaluates sources of evidence used to generate the plurality of candidate answers. The processor identifies missing information from a corpus of data. The missing information comprises any information that improves a confidence score for a candidate answer. The processor generates at least one follow-on inquiry based on the missing information. A network interface outputs the at least one follow-on inquiry to external sources separate from the question-answer system.