QCL-TypeD Collision Handling in Multi-TRP Wireless Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Quasi co-location TypeD (QCL-TypeD) collision handling rules in wireless communication systems do not account for new schemes in multi-Transmission Reception Point (TRP) based Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) transmission, leading to inefficiencies in signal reception and reliability issues with Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH).

Innovation Solution

The implementation of new priority rules and scheduling strategies for handling QCL-TypeD collisions, including the use of multiple Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) States for PDSCH and PDCCH, to determine signal reception based on transmission schemes such as single frequency network (SFN), frequency division multiplexing (FDM), and spatial division multiplexing (SDM), and applying signal reception priority rules, scheduling restrictions, or QCL-TypeD selection rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current QCL-TypeD collision handling rules are used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of PDCCH deteriorates due to inefficiencies in signal reception

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePDCCH reception reliabilityVSAvoidcollision handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of collision handling rules by introducing new priority rules that consider multiple TRP transmission schemes (SFN, FDM, SDM). These rules adjust how QCL-TypeD collisions are resolved by prioritizing certain PDCCH receptions over others based on the transmission scheme, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex additional hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic QCL-TypeD selection rules that adaptively choose between different QCL-TypeD sources based on the detected transmission scheme. The system dynamically switches between different collision handling approaches depending on whether SFN, FDM, or SDM is being used, allowing flexible adaptation to different transmission scenarios while maintaining manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple TCI States are used for PDSCH transmission, then adaptability of transmission schemes is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring signal quality worsens due to QCL-TypeD collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission scheme adaptabilityVSAvoidsignal quality measurement difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the signal quality measurement process by introducing separate measurement rules for different transmission schemes (SFN, FDM, SDM). Each scheme has specific priority rules that determine which PDCCH's QCL-TypeD properties are used for measuring PDSCH signal quality, eliminating the confusion caused by collisions and making measurement straightforward for each segment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces priority rules as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between multiple TCI States and the actual signal quality measurement. The priority rules act as a selector that determines which TCI State's QCL-TypeD properties should be used for measurement, simplifying the measurement process by filtering out conflicting options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If new priority rules for QCL-TypeD collision handling are implemented, then productivity of signal processing is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple transmission schemes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing efficiencyVSAvoidtransmission scheme management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing priority rules before signal processing occurs. The system pre-defines the hierarchy of PDCCH priorities for different transmission schemes, so that when QCL-TypeD collisions occur, the resolution is immediate and automatic based on pre-established rules, eliminating the need for complex real-time decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring specific priority rules to each transmission scheme (SFN, FDM, SDM) rather than using a universal rule. Each scheme has its own optimized collision handling approach, allowing efficient signal processing for each specific case while keeping the overall system manageable through scheme-specific rather than globally complex rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12143988B2Systems and methods for QCL-typed collision handling
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 APPLE INC
  • US12143988B2 patent drawing
  • US12143988B2 patent drawing
  • US12143988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A UE may receive multiple signals causing a Quasi co-location TypeD (QCL-TypeD) collision. To determine which of the multiple signals to select, the UE may use a certain option based on a type transmission scheme associated with each of the multiple signals. The options may include one of a priority rule for signal reception, a scheduling restriction, or a priority rule for QCL-TypeD selection.