QKD Key Relay With Continuous Re-Encryption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum key distribution (QKD) systems face challenges in enhancing the security of encryption keys within key management devices, particularly during the decryption and encryption processes, leading to potential information leakage due to the application keys being processed in plaintext states.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves performing decryption and encryption processes of application keys continuously, prior to or simultaneously with the transfer process, utilizing iptables/nftables on the Linux OS to minimize the time the keys are in plaintext, thereby enhancing security against intrusion attacks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If decryption and encryption processes are performed sequentially with plaintext storage in between, then the ease of operation is improved, but the security is worsened due to keys being exposed in plaintext state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous decryption and encryption operations without storing plaintext keys in memory. The decryption unit decrypts incoming ciphertext keys and immediately passes them to the encryption unit for re-encryption, eliminating the plaintext exposure window. This continuous processing ensures that keys remain encrypted throughout their lifecycle in the key management device, resolving the security issue while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Ease of operation

If keys are stored in plaintext for processing, then the ease of operation is improved, but the risk of information leakage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidinformation leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous encrypted state of keys by performing decryption and encryption in immediate succession without intermediate plaintext storage. The decryption unit processes ciphertext keys and the encryption unit immediately re-encrypts them, ensuring keys never reside in plaintext form in memory or storage, thus eliminating information leakage risks while preserving operational functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing mechanism where decrypted keys are immediately re-encrypted through a chained encryption process. Instead of storing plaintext keys for later use, the system uses an intermediate encryption step that transforms decrypted keys back into encrypted form before they can be exposed, effectively mediating between decryption operations and preventing plaintext exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If decryption is performed before determining transfer destination, then the productivity is improved, but the security is worsened due to extended plaintext exposure time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs decryption as a preliminary action before determining the transfer destination, but immediately follows it with re-encryption. The decryption unit decrypts the ciphertext key first to enable routing decisions, then the encryption unit immediately re-encrypts the decrypted key before forwarding. This preliminary decryption followed by immediate re-encryption maintains productivity while minimizing plaintext exposure time to nearly zero.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous protected state by chaining decryption and encryption operations without interruption. Even though decryption occurs before destination determination, the immediate subsequent encryption ensures the key returns to encrypted state before being transmitted, maintaining the continuous protection paradigm while enabling necessary routing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250286708A1Information processing device, quantum cryptographic communication system, information processing method, and computer program product
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 KK TOSHIBA
  • US20250286708A1 patent drawing
  • US20250286708A1 patent drawing
  • US20250286708A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, an information processing device relays a second encryption key encrypted with a first encryption key shared between opposing quantum key distribution (QKD) devices included in a QKD network. The information processing device includes one or more processors configured to perform a first processing module configured to control, after determining a transfer destination of a received packet, execution of decryption of the encrypted second encryption key included in the packet.