QMS Change Recommendation System Using Dependency Graphs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Change management in Quality Management Systems (QMS) for medical devices is complex due to integrated and referential processes, leading to asynchronous changes that increase regulatory risks and harm, with non-linear impacts governed by latent network topology, making it difficult to evaluate and mitigate risks effectively.

Innovation Solution

A recommendation system that uses natural language processing and graph-theoretic techniques to extract structured metadata, identify meaningful relationships, and calculate potential risks from changes in QMS objects, providing real-time visibility and recommendations to mitigate risks through a derived dependency network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If quality management processes are highly integrated and referential to ensure comprehensive quality control, then product quality and safety are improved, but the complexity of evaluating risk from changes increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidchange risk evaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex QMS document network into a structured dependency graph where documents are nodes and relationships are edges. This segmentation allows the system to break down the overwhelming complexity of change risk evaluation into manageable local assessments of document dependencies, making the evaluation process tractable while maintaining comprehensive quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational layer (the dependency graph analysis system) that mediates between the complex integrated QMS processes and the change risk evaluation. This intermediary automatically traces document relationships and calculates risk metrics, reducing the complexity burden on users while preserving the comprehensive nature of quality management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If changes are made frequently to keep pace with market competition and regulatory requirements, then adaptability and responsiveness are improved, but the risk of asynchronous changes and regulatory violations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness to changeVSAvoidregulatory compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by automatically analyzing document dependencies and calculating risk metrics before changes are implemented. The system pre-identifies which documents are affected by proposed changes and alerts users to potential compliance issues, allowing them to take corrective action before making changes that could violate regulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors the QMS document network, automatically detects changes, and provides real-time alerts about potential compliance risks. This feedback loop enables organizations to maintain high adaptability while ensuring regulatory compliance by immediately notifying users of problematic asynchronous changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If implicit associations between QMS documents are not captured, then the simplicity of the system is maintained, but the ability to identify relevant risks and dependencies is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidrisk information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual documentation and tracking of document relationships with an automated computational system using natural language processing and graph theory. This substitution captures implicit associations between QMS documents that would be impossible to track manually, preserving system simplicity from the user perspective while preventing loss of critical risk information through automated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11841886B2Recommendation system for change management in a quality management system
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 SOLADOC LLC
  • US11841886B2 patent drawing
  • US11841886B2 patent drawing
  • US11841886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quality management system (QMS) contains a collection of documents and content relating to interdependent policies, processes, and procedures required for planning, manufacturing, and marketing complex products. Change management refers to the way a company manages modifications to products and processes within their business and the potential impacts of those changes. A core part of change management is to understand what may be impacted by the change, why it impacted, and how to assess and or identify the risk of the change throughout the company and quality/regulatory processes. The impact assessment is a core part of the process to ensure one does not make changes that create a product and/or process failures as well as evaluating the regulatory impact of such changes. The disclosure pertains to a recommendation system for change management that maps the dependencies between the document contained in the QMS, allows the searching for related documents based on user-supplied criteria, and includes interactive visualization of inter-document dependencies.