QoE Measurement Configuration in Dual Connectivity Without ID Conflicts
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In dual connection scenarios, conflicts arise in identification information for quality of experience (QoE) measurement when both the master node (MN) and secondary node (SN) transmit configurations to user equipment (UE) independently, leading to inconsistencies.
Innovation Solution
The method involves the master node transmitting first identification information to the secondary node, which includes available QoE measurement information, and the secondary node receiving and selecting appropriate identification information to avoid conflicts, ensuring consistent QoE measurement configurations.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If both master node and secondary node transmit QoE configuration to UE independently, then each node can configure QoE measurements autonomously, but conflicts arise in identification information for QoE measurement
Solution Approach 1:
The master node performs preliminary action by determining available QoE measurement identification information and notifying the secondary node before the secondary node configures QoE measurements. This advance notification ensures the secondary node receives and stores the identification information in advance, preventing conflicts when both nodes independently configure QoE measurements to the UE.
Solution Approach 2:
The master node provides feedback to the secondary node by notifying it of the available QoE measurement identification information. This feedback mechanism ensures the secondary node has accurate and consistent identification information, resolving the contradiction between autonomous configuration capability and measurement consistency.
2Reliability
If master node determines and notifies QoE measurement identification information to secondary node, then identification conflicts are avoided, but additional signaling overhead is introduced
Solution Approach 1:
The QoE configuration process is segmented into distinct phases: the master node determines identification information, notifies the secondary node, and the secondary node stores and uses this information for configuration. This segmentation allows the identification information to be transmitted once and reused, reducing redundant signaling compared to continuous verification mechanisms.
3Reliability
If secondary node stores received QoE measurement identification information, then identification conflicts are prevented, but memory resources are consumed
Solution Approach 1:
The secondary node applies local quality by storing QoE measurement identification information locally in its memory. This local storage ensures the node has immediate access to the correct identification information when configuring QoE measurements, preventing conflicts without requiring continuous communication with the master node.
Data Source
AI summary
Provided in the present disclosure are a QoE measurement configuration method, and a master node and a second node. The method comprises: a master node sending first information to a second node, wherein the first information carries first identification information, the first identification information being one or more pieces of identification information for QoE measurement available to the second node.


