QoE Reporting Priority Control During NR Network Overload

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing QoE measurement systems in New Radio (NR) face challenges in managing multiple simultaneous measurements, leading to reporting storms during network overload, with no effective control over priority settings, resulting in potential interruptions and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a priority setting mechanism where the gNB generates indications based on QoE measurement priorities, allowing the UE to suspend or resume reporting based on predefined thresholds, ensuring high-priority measurements are maintained during network overload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the gNB controls QoE measurement reporting to manage overload situations, then the reliability of high-priority reporting is improved, but the device complexity increases due to the need for priority-based indication generation and transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh-priority reporting reliabilityVSAvoidgNB control mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The QoE measurement reporting is segmented by priority levels. The gNB generates separate indications for different priority levels (first priority, second priority, etc.), allowing selective control of reporting based on overload conditions. This segmentation enables the system to maintain high-priority reporting reliability while managing overall system complexity through structured, priority-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gNB changes the parameter of indication transmission based on overload levels. When overload is detected, the gNB modifies which priority levels receive reporting indications, effectively using parameter changes (priority level selection) to maintain reliability for critical measurements while adapting to system constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the gNB suspends low- and middle-priority QoE measurements during overload, then the productivity of high-priority reporting is improved, but the loss of information increases for suspended measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh-priority reporting throughputVSAvoidsuspended measurement data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The gNB performs preliminary actions by generating and transmitting indications to suspend or resume measurements before overload conditions fully impact the system. This allows the UE to proactively adjust measurement activities, maintaining high-priority reporting productivity while minimizing information loss through timely resumption of suspended measurements when conditions improve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement reporting system is made dynamic through the gNB's ability to generate different indications based on current overload conditions. The system can dynamically suspend or resume measurements of different priority levels, allowing flexibility in managing productivity versus information loss based on real-time network state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the UE autonomously determines reporting based on received indications, then the ease of operation is improved, but the measurement precision may be affected by incorrect interpretation of priority-based indications

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE reporting managementVSAvoidQoE measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The gNB provides feedback through structured indications that convey priority-based reporting requirements to the UE. The UE uses these feedback signals to autonomously determine which measurements to report, suspending or resuming based on clear priority directives. This feedback mechanism maintains measurement precision by ensuring the UE correctly interprets gNB intentions regarding measurement priority and reporting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12628025B2Priority setting for quality of experience
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US12628025B2 patent drawing
  • US12628025B2 patent drawing
  • US12628025B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to devices, methods, apparatuses and computer readable storage media of priority setting for Quality of Experience (QoE). The method comprises receiving, from a second device, an indication associated with reporting at least one QoE measurement to be performed at the first device, the indication generated by the second device based on respective priorities of the at least one QoE measurement and determining the reporting of the at least one QoE measurement based on the indication. In this way, the gNB have capability to control configured QoE measurement reporting of the UE and the QoE reporting of the UE with high priority can be maintained without interruption in low-level and middle-level overload situation.