QoS Mapping Mechanism for Inter-RAT Handover Continuity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mechanisms for handling non-guaranteed bit rate (non-GBR) bearers and quality of service (QoS) parameters during inter-radio access technology (RAT) handovers in wireless telecommunications systems often result in service disruptions due to incompatibilities between different radio access networks, particularly between E-UTRAN and UTRAN/GERAN technologies.

Innovation Solution

A standardized mechanism for QoS mapping is introduced to manage non-GBR user agent (UA) aggregated maximum bit rate (AMBR) and access point name (APN) AMBR during handovers, ensuring continuity by mapping AMBRs and MBRs across different networks, allowing for proportional or varying allocations based on active bearers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current mechanisms for handling non-GBR bearers and QoS parameters during inter-RAT handovers are used, then service continuity is maintained in simple scenarios, but service disruptions occur due to incompatibilities between different radio access networks in complex inter-RAT handover scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidcompatibility between different radio access networks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting QoS parameters (AMBR and MBR) during inter-RAT handovers. The source access network determines appropriate MBR values for non-GBR bearers based on the target network's capabilities and current network conditions, transforming the QoS parameter set to ensure compatibility across different radio access technologies while maintaining service continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism where the source access network acts as a mediator during handover preparation. It calculates and determines the MBR values for non-GBR bearers before handover execution, serving as an intermediate step that bridges the QoS parameter systems of different radio access networks and prevents service disruptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If standardized QoS mapping mechanism is implemented to ensure QoS continuity during inter-RAT handovers, then service disruption is reduced, but signaling complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS continuityVSAvoidsignaling and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing QoS parameter determination during the handover preparation phase rather than during execution. The source access network determines MBR values for non-GBR bearers in advance by receiving handover preparation messages and calculating appropriate parameters before the actual handover occurs, thereby simplifying the execution phase while ensuring QoS continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the QoS handling process into distinct phases: handover preparation (where MBR determination occurs) and handover execution. By separating these functions and assigning the complex QoS mapping operations to the preparation phase, the patent reduces processing complexity during critical handover execution while maintaining reliable QoS transitions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3499967B1Mechanism for 3rd generation partnership project multiple inter-network quality of service continuity
Publication Date: 2021.03.10 BLACKBERRY LTD
  • EP3499967B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3499967B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3499967B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for quality of service (QoS) parameters mapping during a handover from a first radio access network (RAN) (source RAN, 104) to a second RAN (target RAN, 106), the first RAN having communication with at least one access point name (APN), comprising: deriving an APN aggregated maximum bit rate (APN-AMBR) based on a maximum bit rate (MBR) of a packet data protocol (PDP) context associated with a first APN of the first RAN (104); providing a local user equipment (UE) aggregated maximum bit rate (UE-AMBR) until a subscribed UE-AMBR is available for the UE,- acquiring the subscribed UE-AMBR,-calculating a derived UE-AMBR by taking the minimum of the subscribed UE-AMBR and the sum of all APN-AMBRs of all active APNs associated with the UR; comparing the derived UE-AMBR to the local UE-AMBR; and initialing a subscribed quality of service (QoS) modification procedure to notify the derived UE-AMBR if the local UE-AMBR is different from the derived UE-AMBR.