QoS Status Reporting for IEEE 802.11 Latency-Aware Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IEEE 802.11 protocols are unable to provide real-time information on Quality of Service (QoS) requirements, leading to inefficient resource allocation for Real Time Application (RTA) traffic, which can result in expired delivery times and wasted communication resources.

Innovation Solution

Non-AP STAs transmit an enhanced Quality of Service Status Report (QoS Status Report, QSR) to the AP, indicating latency requirements of buffered traffic, allowing the AP to schedule trigger-based transmissions to meet these requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If current Buffer Status Report (BSR) mechanisms are used to collect buffer status information from non-AP STAs, then the AP can obtain buffer status information, but real-time information on QoS requirements (particularly latency requirements) is not provided, leading to inefficient resource allocation for RTA traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS requirement informationVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the buffer status information into multiple parts: traditional buffer size information (maintained for backward compatibility) and new QoS-specific information including latency requirements, delivery time constraints, and traffic type identifiers. This segmentation allows the AP to receive both general buffer status and specific QoS requirements separately, enabling efficient resource allocation for RTA traffic while maintaining compatibility with existing BSR mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by having non-AP STAs pre-calculate and pre-report QoS requirement information (such as latency constraints and delivery time requirements) along with buffer status information before actual data transmission occurs. This allows the AP to proactively allocate resources and schedule transmissions to meet QoS requirements, rather than reacting after deadlines are missed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional BSR mechanisms are used, then resource allocation can be performed, but delivery times for RTA traffic may expire due to lack of real-time QoS information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery time guaranteeVSAvoiddata delivery delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where non-AP STAs continuously report QoS requirement information (latency constraints, delivery time requirements, traffic type) to the AP. The AP uses this feedback to dynamically adjust resource allocation and transmission scheduling, ensuring that RTA traffic is delivered within required timeframes. This closed-loop feedback system maintains reliable delivery time guarantees while minimizing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic resource allocation based on real-time QoS requirements. Instead of static allocation, the AP dynamically adjusts transmission parameters (such as trigger-based transmission timing, resource block allocation, and modulation schemes) according to the reported latency requirements and delivery time constraints of different traffic types, ensuring optimal performance for time-sensitive RTA traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If enhanced QoS Status Report (QSR) is transmitted to include latency requirements, then resource allocation efficiency improves, but the complexity of the reporting mechanism increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidreporting mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal enhanced QoS Status Report (QSR) mechanism that serves multiple functions: it maintains compatibility with traditional BSR mechanisms while simultaneously providing detailed QoS requirement information, latency constraints, and traffic type identification. This multi-functional approach allows the same reporting structure to support both legacy applications and advanced QoS requirements, reducing the need for separate mechanisms and thereby limiting complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies existing BSR parameters and introduces new optional parameters (such as latency requirement fields, delivery time constraints, and traffic type identifiers) rather than creating an entirely new reporting protocol. This parameter-based enhancement allows incremental adoption and maintains backward compatibility, reducing implementation complexity compared to a complete protocol overhaul.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12598648B2Enhanced quality of service status report that supports latency requirements
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US12598648B2 patent drawing
  • US12598648B2 patent drawing
  • US12598648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Protocol enhancements for IEEE 802.11 handling of Buffer Status Reports (BSRs) to provide real-time information on Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. A non-AP STA can report QoS status about portions of a buffer, which then allows the AP to schedule transmissions for those buffers toward satisfying their QoS requirements. The non-AP STA can also change parameters of the QoS characteristics element of an existing SCS to allow the AP to schedule transmission for the SCS traffic with the new parameters immediately. The non-AP STA can also report on buffers that should soon arrive to allow the AP to trigger the transmission before those buffers arrive. Additional benefits are also provided.