QoS-Based Uplink and Sidelink Transmission Conflict Resolution
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing uplink/SideLink (SL) transmission conflict resolution methods in V2X scenarios fail to distinguish between uplink transmissions with different Quality of Service (QoS) attributes, leading to unreasonable utilization of transmission resources.
Innovation Solution
A method that prioritizes one transmission over another based on the QoS attributes associated with both transmissions, using specific priority thresholds and conditions to determine the prioritization.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If only the QoS attributes of SL are considered in uplink/SL transmission conflict resolution, then the SL transmission priority can be determined, but the uplink transmissions with different QoS attributes cannot be distinguished leading to unreasonable utilization of transmission resources
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the transmission conflict resolution by introducing multiple priority levels (first priority for uplink, second priority for SL) and multiple thresholds (first threshold, second threshold) to differentiate between various transmission types and their QoS attributes, enabling fine-grained control over transmission prioritization
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameter of priority comparison by introducing threshold-based priority levels. Instead of direct priority comparison, it uses threshold comparisons (first priority vs. first threshold, second priority vs. second threshold) to determine transmission priority, allowing flexible adaptation to different QoS requirements
2Ease of operation
If the priority comparison method is simplified to only consider SL QoS attributes, then the conflict resolution process is simpler, but it leads to unreasonable utilization of transmission resources by not distinguishing uplink transmissions with different QoS attributes
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the priority comparison process into distinct steps: comparing first priority against first threshold, comparing second priority against second threshold, and then determining final transmission priority based on these comparisons. This segmented approach maintains operational simplicity while enabling sophisticated resource differentiation
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies different priority thresholds and comparison criteria to different transmission types (uplink vs. SL). By assigning local quality parameters (first threshold for uplink, second threshold for SL), it enables tailored priority determination for each transmission type while maintaining an overall simple conflict resolution framework
Data Source
AI summary
The disclosure discloses a method for resolving a transmission conflict and relates to the field of wireless communication. The method comprises: when two transmissions experience a conflict, prioritizing the transmission of one transmission among the two transmissions according to quality of service (QoS) attributes respectively associated with the two transmissions. When two transmissions experience a conflict, the QoS attributes of the two transmissions are considered, and the priority of transmission is determined according to the QoS attributes respectively associated with the two transmissions to thereby determine an object that is prioritized for transmission, which may effectively allocate network bandwidth and use network resources more reasonably.


