Competition cheat-preventing system using QR codes and RFID

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cheat-preventing mechanisms in pigeon racing competitions, which involve manual comparison of newspaper halves, are inefficient and prone to errors, leading to potential cheating and unfair results.

Innovation Solution

A system that converts contest encrypted codes into two-dimensional barcodes (QR codes) and uses RFID modules, allowing for automated verification through a computer apparatus and mobile communications device, with the option of a backup RFID system for additional security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual comparison of newspaper halves is used for verification, then the system is simple to implement, but the verification efficiency is low and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical comparison process with an automated optical recognition system. QR codes are printed on newspaper halves, and a mobile device with camera automatically captures and compares these codes, substituting human visual inspection and manual comparison with automated image processing and code recognition algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy of the verification data through QR codes that encode the contest information. Instead of comparing physical newspaper pieces directly, the system captures images of QR codes and processes these digital representations, enabling automated verification while maintaining the simplicity of physical newspaper distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If only one verification mechanism (newspaper comparison) is used, then the system is simple, but the reliability against cheating is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheat-prevention reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the verification system into two independent parallel mechanisms: (1) QR code comparison on newspaper halves, and (2) RFID tag verification. Each mechanism independently verifies contest information, and both must match for successful verification, creating a segmented multi-layered security approach that increases reliability without requiring a single complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent prepares multiple verification mechanisms in advance (QR codes printed on newspaper and RFID tags embedded) before the contest begins. This preliminary preparation ensures that if one verification method fails or is compromised, the other mechanism is already in place to provide backup verification, cushioning against potential cheating attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If RFID module is added as backup system, then the reliability increases, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the mobile device serve multiple functions: it captures QR code images for optical recognition, reads RFID tags through the camera module, and transmits verification data. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate dedicated devices for each verification method, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity despite adding RFID capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system significantly reduces manual intervention and increases the efficiency and security of code verification, effectively preventing cheating by using QR codes and RFID signals for double verification.

Implementation Method 1

The electronic ring of the pigeon ring usually includes a Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) module for being detected by a pigeon clock device (for example, an RFID sensing panel)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRFID (Radio Frequency Identification): Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

identify images of the two-dimensional barcodes in the pigeon rings captured by the camera module of the mobile communications device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical imaging: Photography

Implementation Method 3

The pigeon clock is connected to a Global Positioning System (GPS) module. The GPS module can perform global positioning and time-setting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlobal Positioning System:

Data Source

PatentUS8128470B2Competition cheat-preventing system and method
Publication Date: 2012.03.06 CHENG JIN HAO CHAO
  • US8128470B2 patent drawing
  • US8128470B2 patent drawing
  • US8128470B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A competition cheat-preventing system and method are applicable in a pigeon racing competition, wherein racing pigeons each wear a pigeon ring. An encrypted code-generating module is configured to generate contest encrypted codes from contest codes of the racing pigeons through specific parameter calculations. A barcode converting module is configured to convert the contest encrypted codes into two-dimensional barcodes. A barcode reading module is configured to read the two-dimensional barcodes to obtain original contest encrypted codes. An information transmission module is configured to transmit the original contest encrypted codes to a computer apparatus. An information-receiving module is configured to receive the original contest encrypted codes. A barcode decoding module is configured to perform reverse calculations to restore the original contest encrypted codes to original contest codes. A comparison module is configured to compare the original contest codes with contest codes recorded in the computer apparatus.