QSAR Chemical Toxicity Prediction System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of toxicity testing and relevant hazard data for emerging green consumer chemicals, making it challenging to evaluate their safety and environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system and method for predicting chemical toxicity using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model, integrated with domestic and foreign databases, and analysis instruments to simulate chemical structures and predict toxicity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional toxicity testing methods are used, then accurate toxicity data can be obtained, but research funds and time are consumed, and experimental animals are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoxicity data accuracyVSAvoidresearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary toxicity assessment using QSAR models and molecular fingerprint matching before conducting full-scale experimental testing. By pre-screening chemicals through computational methods, the system identifies high-risk substances that require further testing while eliminating low-risk candidates, thereby reducing overall research time and animal usage while maintaining accurate toxicity data for critical chemicals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates computational models (molecular fingerprints and QSAR models) that replicate the toxicological properties of chemicals without requiring physical testing. These digital copies allow researchers to predict toxicity outcomes virtually, reducing the need for repeated physical experiments and animal testing while preserving measurement precision for substances of concern

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If traditional toxicity testing methods are used, then accurate toxicity data can be obtained, but research funds are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoxicity data accuracyVSAvoidresearch funds
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary toxicity assessment using QSAR models and molecular fingerprint matching before conducting full-scale experimental testing. By pre-screening chemicals through computational methods, the system identifies high-risk substances that require further testing while eliminating low-risk candidates, thereby reducing overall research time and animal usage while maintaining accurate toxicity data for critical chemicals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates computational models (molecular fingerprints and QSAR models) that replicate the toxicological properties of chemicals without requiring physical testing. These digital copies allow researchers to predict toxicity outcomes virtually, reducing the need for repeated physical experiments and animal testing while preserving measurement precision for substances of concern

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If traditional toxicity testing methods are used, then toxicity evaluation can be performed, but experimental animals are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoxicity evaluation capabilityVSAvoidexperimental animal usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates computational models (molecular fingerprints and QSAR models) that replicate the toxicological properties of chemicals without requiring physical testing. These digital copies allow researchers to predict toxicity outcomes virtually, reducing the need for repeated physical experiments and animal testing while preserving measurement precision for substances of concern

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical/biological testing process (animal experiments) with a computational information processing system. By substituting physical experimentation with QSAR modeling and molecular fingerprint analysis, the system eliminates the need for experimental animals while maintaining reliable toxicity evaluation capabilities through validated predictive models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If comprehensive toxicity testing is conducted for emerging green consumer chemicals, then safety evaluation can be achieved, but time and resources are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety evaluation capabilityVSAvoidevaluation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the toxicity evaluation process into distinct computational stages: molecular fingerprint generation, database similarity matching, and QSAR model prediction. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple chemicals through the same framework, significantly improving evaluation efficiency while maintaining comprehensive safety assessment capabilities for emerging green consumer chemicals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal evaluation framework that can assess multiple types of chemicals (industrial wastes, wastewater, discharged water, exhaust gases, products, and byproducts) using the same QSAR models and molecular fingerprint methodology. This multi-functional approach enables simultaneous evaluation of diverse chemical structures without requiring separate testing protocols, thereby enhancing productivity while ensuring reliable safety evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250157590A1Systems and methods for chemical toxicity prediction
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 NAT TAIWAN UNIV
  • US20250157590A1 patent drawing
  • US20250157590A1 patent drawing
  • US20250157590A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for chemical toxicity prediction. The methods of the present disclosure comprise: receiving test data from an analysis instrument; selecting a candidate chemical according to the test data; determining a hazard translated level and a hazard evaluation level of the candidate chemical according to a molecular fingerprint of the candidate chemical; and predicting the toxicity of the candidate chemical by using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model based on the hazard translated level and the hazard evaluation level.