Quad Tilt-Rotor VTOL Aircraft Independent Thrust Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing VTOL designs face stability issues and control difficulties due to adverse moment forces and transition zone instabilities, particularly in high winds, limiting their versatility and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A quad tilt-rotor system with independently controlled tilt angles and thrust for each rotor, allowing seamless transitions between flight phases and active/passive lift modes, enabling superior yaw control and reducing stall risks without vertical stabilizers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If quad-plane design with separate lift and thrust units is used, then VTOL capability is achieved, but aerodynamic instabilities occur in transition zone and control becomes difficult in high winds

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVTOL capabilityVSAvoidaerodynamic stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft divides lift generation into two separate systems: passive aerodynamic lift from the wing and active lift from four vertical thrust units. This segmentation allows independent control of each system, enabling stable transitions between hover and forward flight by progressively transferring load from active to passive lift without aerodynamic instability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft employs dynamic control of the vertical thrust units, varying their thrust output and orientation in real-time based on flight phase and wind conditions. The system transitions from discrete hover/forward flight control regimes to continuous dynamic adjustment, allowing rapid response to gusting winds and maintaining stability throughout the transition zone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If large wing surface area is used in quad-plane design, then passive lift is improved, but aircraft becomes unable to hold position in high winds and control response becomes slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassive lift forceVSAvoidposition holding capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The four vertical thrust units act as active counterbalancing elements that compensate for the large wing surface area's susceptibility to wind forces. By providing adjustable active lift and thrust, these units counteract the destabilizing effects of high winds on the large wing, enabling the aircraft to hold position precisely despite the oversized passive lift surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Device complexity

If discrete control regimes are used for hover and forward flight, then control simplicity is maintained, but seamless transition between flight phases is prevented and translational controllability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidtranslational controllability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from discrete static control regimes to a dynamic continuous control system. The controller continuously adjusts the thrust and orientation of all four vertical thrust units based on real-time flight conditions, enabling seamless transitions between any flight phases and providing superior translational controllability while maintaining manageable system complexity through integrated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system maintains stability and control across all flight phases, enhances translational controllability, and reduces drag, making it safer and more efficient than traditional VTOL designs.

Implementation Method 1

The rotors are independently controllable to provide thrust and lift to the aircraft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

The tilt angle for each unit can be adjusted anywhere from below horizontal, to fully horizontal, and to greater than 90 degrees

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVector control:

Implementation Method 3

These vehicles must overcome stability issues relating to adverse moment forces caused by the environment as well as gyroscopic moment forces due to movement conditions and transitioning phases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscopic moment: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentUS10773802B2Tilt-rotor vertical takeoff and landing aircraft
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 FORWARD ROBOTICS INC
  • US10773802B2 patent drawing
  • US10773802B2 patent drawing
  • US10773802B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides an aircraft system in the tilt-rotor category with four propulsion units where the tilt angle and thrust of each unit is controlled independently of the other units. The tilt angle for each unit can be adjusted anywhere from below horizontal, to fully forward, and to greater than 180 degrees (i.e. tilted backwards). As a result, the system enables greater control during all phases of flight. Due to continuous, independent tilt control of the angle and thrust of each rotor, the present aircraft can avoid stalls much easier than traditional fixed-wing aircraft and other VTOL designs, as thrust vectors can at any moment be adjusted to compensate for loss of wing lift, making the aircraft safer to use.