Quadratic Voting System for Preference Intensity Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional voting systems fail to accurately elicit and aggregate the intensity of preferences, leading to inaccurate outcomes due to the 'tyranny of the majority' and inconsistent voting, resulting in poor decision-making.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a quadratic voting system that allows respondents to allocate a budget of real or artificial currency according to a quadratic function, providing visual and tactile interfaces to help users understand the cost of their votes, and recording user interactions to generate accurate preference data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional voting systems are used, then simplicity and ease of operation are maintained, but measurement precision of preference intensity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreference intensity measurementVSAvoidvoting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the voting mechanism by changing the cost parameter from linear to quadratic. Instead of each vote costing one unit of currency, the cost to cast n votes is n² currency units. This parameter change enables the system to measure preference intensity accurately, as voters must strategically allocate their budgets considering the quadratic cost structure, thereby revealing their true preference strengths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If quadratic voting is implemented, then preference intensity measurement is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreference intensity measurementVSAvoidvoting operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates real-time feedback by displaying to voters how their currency budget translates into voting power under the quadratic cost structure. This feedback mechanism helps voters understand the implications of their spending decisions and adjust their voting strategies accordingly, making the complex quadratic voting process more intuitive and easier to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If quadratic voting is implemented, then preference aggregation accuracy is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreference aggregation accuracyVSAvoiduser comprehension information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces visual metaphors and intermediary representations (such as visual depictions of knobs, cords, springs, dials, and funnels) that mediate between the complex quadratic cost structure and user comprehension. These visual intermediaries translate abstract quadratic relationships into intuitive visual forms, reducing information loss while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If visual metaphors are used to explain quadratic function, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface easeVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses visual copies and metaphors (knobs, cords, springs, dials, funnels) that replicate familiar physical concepts in the digital interface. These visual copies leverage users' existing mental models of physical objects to explain the abstract quadratic relationship, improving ease of operation without significantly increasing perceived interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9754272B2System and method for quadratic, near-quadratic, and convex voting in various types of research and voting
Publication Date: 2017.09.05 COLLECTIVE DECISION ENGINES INC
  • US9754272B2 patent drawing
  • US9754272B2 patent drawing
  • US9754272B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for eliciting and aggregating truthful preferences of respondents, with steps of assigning a currency budget to a respondent and generating a user interface. The user interface: displays budgets for each respondent; displays choices among alternative outcomes for each respondent and a method for allocating votes among options by paying according to a quadratic function; displays the outcome of the voting for each respondent; enables a third party to select and contact respondents; enables the third party to observe voting choices and final voting outcomes; and enables the third party to control budgets and voting options.