Double Articulated Quadrilateral Hinge Damper Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing double articulated quadrilateral hinges face issues with damper placement, fluid leakage, and return spring interference, leading to increased encumbrance, fluid loss, and premature mechanical deterioration.

Innovation Solution

The damper is positioned between an arm of the articulated quadrilateral and a common lever, with a horizontal orientation when closed to prevent fluid loss, and a spring mechanism that only engages when the door is open, reducing user effort and extending spring life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the damper is positioned between the plate and the articulated quadrilateral, then the damping function is achieved, but the encumbrance increases and the hinge becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping functionVSAvoidencumbrance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The damper is integrated into the existing articulated quadrilateral mechanism by positioning it between the arm and common lever, merging the damping function with the structural components rather than adding it as a separate external element. This reduces overall encumbrance while maintaining the damping function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The damper is nested within the space already defined by the articulated quadrilateral components, utilizing the existing structural envelope. The damper fits into the mechanical arrangement without requiring additional external space, thereby reducing encumbrance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If the damper is completely exposed towards the outside, then the damping function is accessible, but fluid loss occurs and dirties the door panel or frame

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping functionVSAvoidfluid loss and dirt
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The damper is nested within the articulated quadrilateral structure, specifically between the arm and common lever, which provides a protective enclosure. This positioning shields the damping fluid from external exposure, preventing leakage and contamination while maintaining the damping function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The structural components of the articulated quadrilateral (arm and common lever) act as intermediaries that enclose and protect the damper. These components serve as a barrier between the damping fluid and the external environment, preventing fluid loss and dirt accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If the return spring acts on the articulation during the whole movement from open to closed condition, then the spring provides continuous support, but the user must overcome the spring force even when it does not facilitate movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring supportVSAvoiduser effort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The return spring engages periodically rather than continuously - it acts on the articulation only during specific portions of the movement cycle where it can facilitate motion. During other phases, the spring disengages or reduces its action, allowing the user to operate the door without overcoming unnecessary spring force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring provides partial action rather than full continuous action. It applies force only during the ranges of movement where it can be mechanically effective in facilitating the door motion, rather than maintaining constant engagement throughout the entire movement cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Stability of the object's composition

If the return spring supports the whole weight of the door panel in open condition, then the door remains stable, but the spring wire diameter increases and mechanical characteristics deteriorate over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor stabilityVSAvoidspring durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The return spring engages periodically to support the door weight during specific phases of operation, rather than bearing the full continuous load. This periodic engagement reduces the cumulative stress on the spring, preserving its mechanical characteristics and extending its service life while maintaining door stability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring provides partial support action rather than bearing the complete door weight continuously. It applies supporting force only during the portions of the movement cycle where mechanically advantageous, reducing the overall load duration and intensity on the spring structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration results in a more compact hinge design with reduced fluid leakage and improved user experience by minimizing spring interference during door opening, while maintaining stable run-end positions and prolonging spring durability.

Implementation Method 1

a damper for damping the transition between the open configuration and the closed configuration and viceversa

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Implementation Method 2

the damper slows down the movement of the door panel avoiding these drawbacks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous damping: Viscous Damping

Implementation Method 3

The hinge comprises a damper for damping the transition between the open configuration and the closed configuration and viceversa, with a spring that acts on the articulation of the hinge only in a predetermined range of movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP3115531B1Double articulated quadrilateral hinge with damper
Publication Date: 2020.04.08 SYST HOLZ
  • EP3115531B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3115531B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3115531B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The present invention relates to a dampened snap-hinge (1,10), comprising: - a first articulated quadrilateral (2) comprising a first plate (4) and provided with a first and second lever (23,32) and an arm (21) - a second articulated quadrilateral (3) comprising a second plate (5) and provided with a first and second lever (23,32) and an arm (31) said first (23) and second (32) lever being in common between the first (2) and the second (3) articulated quadrilateral, the hinge (1,10) being movable between an open configuration and a closed configuration, in which the plates (4,5) are arranged differently with respect to each other, wherein the hinge (1,10) also comprises a damper (7) for damping the transition between the open configuration and the closed configuration and vice versa, wherein said damper (7) is interposed between one of the first or second levers (23,32) and said arm (21,31) of one of the first (2) and second (3) quadrilaterals.