Quadruple Acting Scotch Yoke Engine Dual-Sided Piston Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 2-stroke engines fail to exploit the full potential of piston motion for energy conversion due to limitations in connecting rod designs, leading to inefficiencies and high emissions, while 4-stroke engines have become overly complex and costly in attempts to meet emissions standards, resulting in engines with marginal performance gains.

Innovation Solution

A quadruple acting scotch yoke engine design where each piston completes two full cycles and power strokes per revolution, utilizing dual-sided pistons to convert linear forces into rotational energy simultaneously, with innovative lubrication and ignition systems to enhance efficiency and power-to-weight ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional connecting rod engines are used, then the bottom of the piston can be accessed by the crankcase, but the engine cannot exploit both sides of the piston for energy conversion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidengine design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The piston is segmented into two independent working sides (top and bottom), each capable of independent combustion and power generation. The scotch yoke mechanism divides the piston's motion into two separate linear actuators that can be independently controlled, allowing both sides of the piston to contribute to power output simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The engine transitions from conventional rotational crankshaft motion to linear scotch yoke motion, adding a dimensional change that allows the piston to push and pull on connecting rods in opposite directions simultaneously. This dimensional transformation enables dual-sided power extraction without the mechanical constraints of traditional crankshaft designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If 4-stroke engines use computer controls and electronics to reduce emissions, then emissions standards are met, but the engines become more complex and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the complex electronic control systems, catalytic converters, and sensor arrays from conventional 4-stroke engines. By using a dual 2-stroke cycle design with proper tuning and combustion control, the engine achieves emissions compliance through mechanical design alone, removing unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The engine uses its own dual-sided combustion process to inherently control emissions through proper air-fuel mixing and combustion timing on both sides of the piston. The design self-regulates emissions without requiring external electronic intervention or after-treatment devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Use of energy by moving object

If conventional 4-stroke engines are optimized for efficiency, then thermal efficiency reaches 50%, but power to weight ratio becomes abysmal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal efficiencyVSAvoidpower to weight ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The dual 2-stroke cycle design ensures continuous power generation on both sides of the piston throughout the entire rotation cycle. While one side is on the power stroke, the other is on the compression or exhaust stroke, creating overlapping power pulses that maintain continuous useful action and improve power density without sacrificing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The compression process on one side of the piston begins while the other side is still generating power, allowing overlapping cycles that maximize the utilization of each combustion event. This preliminary action on one side prepares for the next power stroke while the current power stroke is still active, improving overall efficiency and power density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If scotch-yoke engines are designed with higher power to weight ratio, then efficiency improves, but the performance increase is not sufficient to justify switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower to weight ratioVSAvoidperformance justification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges two 2-stroke cycles into a single engine design, with both sides of the piston contributing to power output. This combination doubles the effective power strokes per revolution compared to conventional engines, achieving a performance increase that clearly justifies the design transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-sided piston design creates a universal engine that can operate efficiently across a wider range of applications and conditions. Each side of the piston can be independently tuned for different fuel types or operating conditions, making the engine more adaptable and justifying the switch from conventional designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The quadruple acting scotch yoke engine achieves higher thermal efficiency and power-to-weight ratio, with reduced internal friction and complexity, making it more robust, adaptable, and easier to maintain, while eliminating the need for complex electronic controls.

Implementation Method 1

upon reaching bottom dead center, the other side of the same piston is compressing a new charge of fuel and air mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

it combusts the fuel and air mixture and pushes downward on the connecting rod through the downstroke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

the other side of the same piston is compressing a new charge of fuel and air mixture, which then subsequently ignites and pushes on the piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS11686245B2Quadruple acting scotch yoke engine
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 HUDDLESTON SKY MOON
  • US11686245B2 patent drawing
  • US11686245B2 patent drawing
  • US11686245B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a two strokes per cycle Scotch Yoke engine that completes four power strokes per revolution per pair of pistons/cylinders by using both sides of each piston as a combustion chamber. This doubles the power to weight ratio over previous scotch yoke engines and quadruples the power to weight ratio over conventional 4 stroke cycle engines. The present invention is capable of operating in and withstanding the forces of either deflagration (subsonic) and pulse detonation (supersonic) cycles, and is capable of homogeneous charge compression ignition. The present invention can also be an internal/external combustion gas/steam hybrid. The present invention can operate under constant volume or constant pressure cycles as well as most thermal cycles of operation (EG the Otto and Diesel cycle). The present invention works best when using a modified Humphrey cycle to achieve homogeneous charge compression ignition pulse detonation engine using constant volume combustion.