Quality Audit Heatmap Scheduling for Repetitive Issue Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional quality management in manufacturing involves manual and inefficient processes, leading to delayed detection and resolution of repetitive quality issues, resulting in low efficiency and incomplete problem tracking.

Innovation Solution

An intellectual quality management method utilizing a heatmap risk platform, AI-driven audit scheduling, and neural network-based recommendation systems to automatically generate audit plans and provide real-time risk assessments and corrective actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual audit scheduling and problem tracking are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but productivity and detection timeliness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudit scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical audit scheduling with an intelligent system that uses machine learning algorithms and neural networks to automatically generate audit plans, schedule audits, and track problems. This substitution dramatically improves productivity by eliminating manual paperwork and scheduling while the system's modular architecture manages complexity through standardized interfaces and automated workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The intelligent quality management system performs self-service by automatically detecting repetitive problems from historical data, generating audit plans without human intervention, and triggering notifications to relevant personnel. The system serves itself by continuously learning from new data and improving its audit scheduling accuracy over time, reducing the need for manual configuration and management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If traditional paper-based audit procedures are used, then information integration is avoided, but loss of information and timeliness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality management information completenessVSAvoidaudit process automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal digital platform that consolidates multiple quality management functions including audit planning, execution, problem tracking, and analysis into a single integrated system. This multi-functional system eliminates information loss by centralizing all quality data in a standardized digital format that can be accessed and processed by different modules and users simultaneously, while the automated workflows ensure timely information propagation throughout the organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a digital intermediary layer between various quality management activities and stakeholders. This intermediary platform standardizes data collection from diverse sources, processes information through automated algorithms, and delivers timely notifications to relevant personnel, preventing information loss and ensuring consistent communication across the organization without requiring full automation of all underlying processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual problem tracking is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but detection precision and repetitive problem identification deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem detection accuracyVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously analyzing historical quality data and learning from past problems before new issues arise. The neural network models are pre-trained on historical data to recognize patterns and predict potential quality issues, enabling the system to detect repetitive problems with high precision before they recur, while the automated learning process manages the complexity of analyzing large datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors audit results and problem resolutions, feeds this information back into the learning models, and automatically adjusts its detection algorithms. This closed-loop feedback system improves measurement precision over time by learning from actual outcomes, while the automated feedback processing manages the complexity of analyzing and acting on large volumes of quality data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11829111B2Intellectual quality management method, electronic device and computer readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 SHENZHEN FULIAN FUGUI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO LTD
  • US11829111B2 patent drawing
  • US11829111B2 patent drawing
  • US11829111B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intellectual quality management method is disclosed. A heatmap risk interface is created according to the required data and the parameter configuration which are calculated using a time dependent risk priority number (RPN) equation. An intellectual audit scheduling algorithm is defined via the heatmap risk interface to automatically generate at least one audit plan. An audit program corresponding to the audit plan is performed and a plurality of problem points are selected. Intellectual root cause category recommendation is performed to the questions points. intellectual corrective actions and preventive action recommendations are performed to the problem points according to the intellectual root cause category recommendation to obtain at least one optimum corrective action and at least one preventive action. Corrective actions are performed to each audit unit according to the corrective action to solve the problem points and prevention actions are performed to each audit unit according to the preventive action.