Quality Estimation Models for Signal Characteristics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quality estimation models struggle to accurately evaluate specific signal characteristics, such as speech quality and background noise, due to reliance on overall quality labels, which can lead to inadequate training of data enhancement models and introduction of artifacts, and they lack robustness across diverse impairments and recording conditions.

Innovation Solution

Training separate quality estimation models to estimate specific signal characteristics using diverse impairments and artifacts introduced by different data enhancement models, allowing for the generation of synthetic quality labels that can optimize data enhancement models for specific applications and improve robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If separate quality estimation models are trained for different signal characteristics, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality estimation accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the quality estimation task into multiple specialized models, each trained to estimate a specific signal characteristic (e.g., speech quality, background noise, artifacts). This segmentation allows each model to focus on particular features, improving measurement precision for each characteristic while managing overall system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-functional quality estimation system where multiple specialized models work together to provide comprehensive signal quality assessment. Each model contributes to different aspects of quality evaluation, and their combined outputs provide a complete picture of signal characteristics across various dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If diverse impairments and artifacts are used in training, then adaptability is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness across impairmentsVSAvoidsignal quality degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying impairment types, severity levels, and artifact characteristics during training data generation. This includes adjusting noise levels, distortion types, and degradation parameters to create diverse training scenarios, enabling models to adapt to various real-world conditions while maintaining signal quality through controlled parameter ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts harmful impairments and artifacts into beneficial training elements. By intentionally introducing diverse degradations during training, the system learns to recognize and compensate for these issues, transforming potential quality losses into opportunities for improved model robustness and generalization to real-world degraded signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS12153648B2Quality estimation models for various signal characteristics
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12153648B2 patent drawing
  • US12153648B2 patent drawing
  • US12153648B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document relates to training and employing of quality estimation models to estimate the quality of different signal characteristics. One example includes a method or technique that can be performed on a computing device. The method or technique can include obtaining training signals exhibiting diverse impairments introduced when the training signals are captured or diverse artifacts introduced by different processing characteristics of a plurality of data enhancement models. The method or technique can also include obtaining quality labels for different signal characteristics of the training signals. The method or technique can also include training at least two different quality estimation models to estimate quality of at least two different signal characteristics based at least on the training signals and the quality labels.