Quality Estimator Evaluation via Synthetic Image Stress Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating image and video quality are subjective, time-consuming, and expensive, with varying accuracy depending on circumstances, and existing quality estimators (QEs) can be vulnerable to misclassification errors and systematic weaknesses, making them prone to exploitation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for objectively evaluating QEs using techniques such as generating images with potential false ties and orderings, employing proxy quality estimators, and bisection searching, to identify vulnerabilities and improve the accuracy of QEs through stress testing and vulnerability assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If subjective testing is used to evaluate image and video quality, then evaluation accuracy can be maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates synthetic test images that replicate and exaggerate specific quality degradation patterns (compression artifacts, noise, blur) to simulate real-world quality issues. These synthetic test cases serve as copies of real quality problems, enabling automated evaluation that captures essential quality characteristics without requiring actual human subjects or expensive testing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system systematically varies multiple quality parameters (compression ratio, noise level, blur degree) across different test images to create a comprehensive test suite. By changing these parameters methodically, the evaluation can cover a wide range of quality scenarios efficiently, maintaining accuracy while reducing the time and cost associated with subjective testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If representative images are used in subjective testing, then evaluation reliability is improved, but the evaluation is limited to expected behavior only

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the quality evaluation into distinct degradation categories (compression artifacts, noise, blur, color distortion) and creates specialized test images for each category. This segmentation allows the system to evaluate expected behavior reliably while also testing edge cases and unexpected scenarios by targeting specific degradation types individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of starting with representative real-world images and observing quality degradation naturally occurring, the patent inverts the approach by directly creating images with controlled, exaggerated degradation patterns. This inversion enables the system to test both expected behavior and edge cases by deliberately constructing scenarios that challenge the quality estimator's robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If quality estimators are used to evaluate image and video quality, then evaluation efficiency is improved, but misclassification errors and systematic weaknesses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation efficiencyVSAvoidquality estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates multiple quality estimators and compares their outputs against each other and against ground truth labels from synthetic test images. This feedback mechanism identifies misclassification errors and systematic weaknesses in individual estimators, allowing the system to correct errors and improve overall estimation accuracy while maintaining high evaluation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple quality estimation algorithms into a composite evaluation system where each estimator contributes to the overall assessment. By integrating multiple estimators with different strengths and weaknesses, the system achieves both high efficiency and improved reliability, as the composite approach can compensate for individual estimator failures through cross-validation and consensus mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS8693797B2Method and apparatus for evaluating quality estimators
Publication Date: 2014.04.08 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US8693797B2 patent drawing
  • US8693797B2 patent drawing
  • US8693797B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that incorporates teachings of the present disclosure may include, for example, distorting a seed image to generate first and second images where the distortions cause the first and second images to have a potential false tie according to a target quality estimator and generating a third image from the first and second images where the third image is generated based on a proxy quality estimator so that the third image has a potential false ordering according to the target quality estimator. Other embodiments are disclosed.