Automated Quality Measure Tracking via Document Abstraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Healthcare providers face challenges in accurately and efficiently reporting quality measures due to the time-consuming and costly nature of this process, often lacking access to necessary information, such as lab reports from third-party providers, which can lead to inconsistent and incomplete reporting.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for identifying and reporting quality measures by abstracting content from documents, determining quality measure categories, obtaining definitions with criteria and keywords, and generating reports that include satisfied and unsatisfied criteria, with alerts for pending measures, using natural language processing and medical codes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If transcription services manually track and report quality measures, then reporting accuracy can be improved, but time consumption and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereporting accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual transcription services with an automated computer-based system that uses natural language processing, pattern matching, and electronic document analysis to identify and track quality measure criteria. This substitution of mechanical human labor with automated computing processes maintains reporting accuracy while dramatically reducing time consumption and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables quality measure tracking to occur automatically without requiring external transcription services. The computer system self-services by autonomously analyzing clinical documents, extracting relevant information, and generating quality measure reports, thereby eliminating the need for separate manual transcription and tracking processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If transcription services access all necessary information including third-party lab reports, then reporting completeness improves, but system complexity and access requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereporting completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computer system is designed with universal access capabilities that enable it to retrieve and analyze information from multiple diverse sources including electronic health records, lab reports from third-party providers, and other clinical documents. This multi-functional access architecture ensures reporting completeness without requiring separate specialized systems for each data source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs intermediary components such as standardized interfaces, electronic health record integrations, and data exchange protocols that facilitate access to third-party lab reports and other external information sources. These intermediaries simplify the complexity of direct access by providing standardized mediation layers between the quality measure tracking system and diverse data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If quality measures are tracked after patient discharge, then reporting can be completed, but opportunities to improve care quality are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereporting efficiencyVSAvoidquality of care improvement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously and automatically monitoring quality measure criteria during the patient encounter and immediately upon document generation, rather than waiting until after discharge. This real-time tracking during the encounter enables immediate identification of missing or unsatisfied criteria, allowing providers to take corrective action while the patient is still under care, thereby improving quality of care while maintaining reporting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9779211B2Computer-assisted abstraction for reporting of quality measures
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES CO
  • US9779211B2 patent drawing
  • US9779211B2 patent drawing
  • US9779211B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are disclosed for tracking quality measures in abstracted documents. Embodiments include, determining, based on the abstracted content, a quality measure category, obtaining a quality measure definition corresponding to a quality measure included in the determined quality measure category, determining, based on keywords corresponding to the criterion, whether a portion of the abstracted content satisfies a criterion, recording, in association with the criterion, a reference to the portion of the abstracted content that satisfies the criterion; and selectively generating, a report including the query corresponding to the criterion, a query response, and the portion of the abstracted content satisfying the criterion.