Quality Score Ranking for Sparse Context-Aware Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional recommendation systems (RSs) face challenges such as data sparseness, popularity bias, and lack of contextual information, leading to poor personalization and inefficient resource usage, particularly in context-aware recommendation systems (CARSs).

Innovation Solution

A quality score-based recommendation system that incorporates contextual information and uses a random forest classifier to rank item listings or collections, considering attributes like device type, user engagement, and historical performance, thereby providing personalized recommendations without relying on user ratings or historical data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional collaborative filtering or content-based recommendation systems are used, then the system can provide basic recommendations, but they suffer from data sparseness and popularity bias leading to poor personalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoiddata sparseness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple recommendation approaches (collaborative filtering, content-based, and contextual) into a unified quality score-based system. The quality score integrates user behavior data, item attributes, and contextual information to overcome the limitations of individual methods and reduce data sparseness impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces contextual information as an intermediary element that bridges the gap between user preferences and item recommendations. This contextual layer (including device type, location, time) mediates the recommendation process to provide more accurate predictions even when direct user-item interaction data is sparse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If context-aware recommendation systems are implemented to improve personalization, then user experience is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter representation by using quality scores that incorporate contextual parameters (device type, location, time) rather than relying solely on traditional user-item interaction matrices. This parameter transformation enables personalization while managing system complexity through a unified scoring mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional recommendation systems are used, then implementation is straightforward, but they exhibit popularity bias and fail to recommend new or niche items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidpopularity bias
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating item-specific quality scores that evaluate each item independently based on its attributes and contextual relevance rather than relying on overall popularity metrics. This allows niche and new items to receive appropriate recommendations based on their local characteristics and contextual fit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260057021A1Systems, apparatuses, and methods for providing a quality score based recommendation
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 EBAY INC
  • US20260057021A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057021A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057021A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more of the systems, apparatuses, or methods discussed herein can include a quality score for a plurality of item listings or collections of item listings. Data sparseness can be avoided, as the quality score is based on inherent properties of the listing. An item listing can be recommended to a user based on the quality score. In one or more embodiments, a method can include determining a plurality of quality scores including a quality score for each of a plurality of item listings or a plurality of collections of item listings, the quality scores determined independent of a user's attributes and independent of the user's contextual information, the contextual information corresponding to details of the user's access to a website, and recommending an item listing or collection of item listings to a user based on the quality scores and the contextual information.