Quality Score Ranking for Sparse-Data Item Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional recommendation systems (RSs) face challenges such as data sparseness, popularity bias, and lack of contextual information, leading to poor personalization and inefficient resource usage, particularly in Context Aware Recommendation Systems (CARSs).

Innovation Solution

A quality score-based recommendation system that incorporates contextual information and uses a random forest classifier to rank item listings or collections, considering features like device type, operating system, and user attributes, to provide personalized recommendations without relying on user ratings or historical data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional recommendation systems use collaborative filtering or content-based methods, then they can provide recommendations, but they suffer from data sparseness and popularity bias leading to poor personalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization qualityVSAvoiddata sparseness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-computes quality scores for item listings using a random forest classifier trained on item attributes and historical performance data. This preliminary action stores pre-calculated quality metrics that can be quickly retrieved and combined with contextual information during recommendation generation, avoiding the need to process sparse user data from scratch and enabling reliable personalization even for new users without historical interactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces quality scores as an intermediary metric that bridges the gap between item attributes and user preferences. These quality scores serve as a mediator that combines item features with historical performance data, providing a reliable basis for recommendations that doesn't depend on sparse user interaction data, thereby improving personalization quality while overcoming data sparseness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If context aware recommendation systems incorporate contextual information, then they improve personalization, but they increase computational overhead and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system is segmented into distinct functional modules: a random forest classifier for quality score computation, a contextual information processor for handling device and user attributes, and a recommendation generator. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific tasks, improving personalization accuracy through focused processing while managing system complexity through modular design that enables independent optimization and maintenance of each component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Contextual information such as device type, operating system, and user attributes is pre-processed and stored in structured formats before recommendation generation. This preliminary organization of contextual data reduces the computational burden during real-time recommendation delivery, allowing the system to achieve high personalization accuracy without excessive computational overhead by having contextual information ready for efficient integration with quality scores

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If recommendation systems process user ratings and historical data, then they can provide personalized recommendations, but they increase computational overhead and processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-computes quality scores for item listings using a random forest classifier trained on item attributes and historical performance data. These pre-calculated quality scores are stored and can be quickly retrieved during recommendation generation, eliminating the need to re-process historical data for each recommendation query. This preliminary computation significantly reduces processing time while maintaining high recommendation accuracy through the use of pre-analyzed quality metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and separates the quality score computation from the real-time recommendation generation process. By extracting the computationally intensive random forest classification into a pre-processing step that operates independently of user queries, the system removes the time-consuming data processing from the critical recommendation delivery path, thereby reducing processing time while preserving recommendation accuracy through the use of pre-computed quality metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12481711B2Systems, apparatuses, and methods for providing a quality score based recommendation
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 EBAY INC
  • US12481711B2 patent drawing
  • US12481711B2 patent drawing
  • US12481711B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more of the systems, apparatuses, or methods discussed herein can include a quality score for a plurality of item listings or collections of item listings. Data sparseness can be avoided, as the quality score is based on inherent properties of the listing. An item listing can be recommended to a user based on the quality score. In one or more embodiments, a method can include determining a plurality of quality scores including a quality score for each of a plurality of item listings or a plurality of collections of item listings, the quality scores determined independent of a user's attributes and independent of the user's contextual information, the contextual information corresponding to details of the user's access to a website, and recommending an item listing or collection of item listings to a user based on the quality scores and the contextual information.