Quantitative Education System Using Learning Element Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional computer-aided education methods fail to effectively measure and synchronize learning of real-world skills, such as driving a car, and struggle to determine user abilities based on pedagogical exercises, as they lack quantitative and measurable metrics to assess progress and adapt to individual user knowledge levels.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of 'learning elements' that provide quantitative metrics by analyzing user responses to pedagogical exercises executed by both humans and computer programs, using techniques like coverage bitmaps and delta bitmaps to estimate user abilities and adapt learning processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional computer-aided education methods are used, then basic teaching can be provided, but quantitative measurement of learning progress and adaptation to individual user knowledge levels cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement of learning progressVSAvoidcomplexity of education system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the learning process into discrete learning elements (LEs) that can be individually measured and tracked. Each LE represents a specific skill or knowledge component, allowing the system to break down complex learning progress into measurable units. This segmentation enables precise measurement of user ability in each element while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor user responses to pedagogical exercises and update the quantitative assessment of learning elements. By analyzing user performance data and comparing it against predefined criteria, the system provides feedback that refines the measurement of learning progress and adapts the education approach to individual user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If quantitative metrics are introduced to measure user abilities, then learning progress can be precisely tracked, but the complexity of analyzing and processing user response data increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of user ability assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms complex user performance data into simplified quantitative parameters representing learning element states. By defining specific measurable parameters (such as correctness, completeness, and temporal characteristics of responses), the system converts complex behavioral data into manageable numerical representations that can be easily processed and analyzed to determine user abilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a computational model that copies and simulates user learning patterns by analyzing responses to pedagogical exercises. This modeling approach allows the system to replicate user learning trajectories and predict future performance without requiring complex real-time analysis, thereby reducing processing complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If pedagogical exercises are provided to both users and computer programs, then learning elements can be generated and analyzed, but the time required to execute and evaluate these exercises increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of skill acquisitionVSAvoidtime for exercise execution and evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining learning elements, their associated pedagogical exercises, and evaluation criteria before actual learning occurs. This preparation allows for rapid execution and evaluation during the learning process, as the framework is already in place and does not require complex real-time analysis or adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the system to skip unnecessary evaluation steps by using the computer program to execute pedagogical exercises and generate learning elements automatically. This automation allows the system to rush through time-consuming manual analysis procedures, efficiently capturing user ability information without requiring extensive human evaluation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS10878713B2Quantitative education system
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 SWAMINATHAN PRATHIBA
  • US10878713B2 patent drawing
  • US10878713B2 patent drawing
  • US10878713B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for computer-aided education include providing at least a part of a pedagogical exercise to a user to obtain a user response to the at least the part of the pedagogical exercise from the user, and also providing at least the part of the pedagogical exercise to a computer program. One or more learning elements corresponding to the at least the part of the pedagogical exercise are generated based, at least in part on the execution of the at least the part of the pedagogical exercise by the computer program. The user's abilities are analyzed with respect to the one or more learning elements based on the user response, and aspects of the learning elements such as a learned-state, not-learned state, probabilities for transition between the states, retention time, etc., are used in quantitatively education of the user.