Quantized Signal Correlation for Computer System Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for analyzing performance metrics in computer systems are inadequate due to their complexity and the sheer number of metrics involved, often requiring manual specification and are time-consuming, error-prone, and fail to capture all dependencies between metrics, especially with changing system topologies.

Innovation Solution

The approach involves converting performance metric signals into quantized signals with a reduced set of allowable values, focusing on the timing of anomalies to identify inter-relationships between metrics, allowing for efficient detection of correlations and dependencies by simplifying the analysis process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual specification of performance metric relationships is used, then user control over analysis is improved, but time consumption and error rate increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic analysis of performance metric relationships without requiring manual user specification. The automated anomaly detection and correlation analysis algorithms independently identify metric dependencies, eliminating the need for users to manually define relationships while reducing time consumption and errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors performance metrics and provides feedback about identified relationships and anomalies. This automated feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing system topologies dynamically, maintaining accurate relationship identification without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If Granger causality algorithm is used to detect causal influence, then automated analysis is improved, but complete dependency capture is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated analysisVSAvoiddependency capture completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple analysis approaches: automated anomaly detection, temporal correlation analysis, and Granger causality testing. This merged approach complements each other's strengths, achieving more complete dependency capture by detecting both temporal patterns and causal relationships simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its analysis based on detected patterns and system state. It adjusts detection sensitivity and correlation thresholds in real-time, allowing it to capture evolving dependencies as system topologies change, thereby improving reliability while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If large numbers of performance metrics are monitored, then system health measurement accuracy is improved, but monitoring complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem health measurement accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses analysis on anomaly timing patterns rather than continuously processing all metric values. By extracting temporal anomaly signals and correlating these simplified representations, the system maintains measurement accuracy while reducing monitoring complexity through selective focus on critical temporal patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the monitoring process into distinct phases: data collection, anomaly detection, correlation analysis, and relationship identification. This segmentation allows systematic processing of large metric sets while managing complexity through structured analysis stages, improving accuracy without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9524223B2Performance metrics of a computer system
Publication Date: 2016.12.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9524223B2 patent drawing
  • US9524223B2 patent drawing
  • US9524223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Identifying an inter-relationship between performance metrics of a computer system. It is proposed to convert performance metric signals, which represent variations of performance metrics over time, into quantized signals having a set of allowable discrete values. The quantized signals are compared to detect a correlation based on the timing of variations quantized signals. An inter-relationship between the performance metrics may then be identified based on a detected correlation between the quantized signals.