Quantum Annealing Logic Circuit Encoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for solving computational problems, particularly discrete optimization and constraint satisfaction problems, are inefficient due to the difficulty in effectively encoding logic circuit representations as discrete optimization problems that can be solved using quantum processors.

Innovation Solution

The method involves encoding a logic circuit representation as a discrete optimization problem, such as a QUBO, and solving it using a quantum processor, which enables the simultaneous control of multiple annealing schedules and the use of adiabatic quantum computation or quantum annealing to find solutions to computational problems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If logic circuit representations are encoded as discrete optimization problems for quantum processing, then computational efficiency is improved, but the encoding complexity and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidencoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The logic circuit is divided into individual logic gates, with each gate being independently encoded as a separate discrete optimization problem. This segmentation allows the complex encoding task to be broken down into manageable units, where each logic gate (AND, OR, NOT, etc.) has its own objective function that can be solved independently by the quantum processor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transforms the logic circuit representation into a discrete optimization problem by changing the parameters from boolean logic states to optimization variables with associated objective functions. Each logic gate's truth table is converted into an objective function that the quantum processor minimizes, fundamentally changing the problem representation from logical operations to mathematical optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If quantum processors are used to solve discrete optimization problems, then solution accuracy is improved, but the system complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces an intermediary encoding layer that translates logic circuit representations into discrete optimization problems suitable for quantum processing. This intermediary formulation (the QUBO or Ising model representation) acts as a bridge between classical logic circuits and quantum processors, allowing accurate solution computation while managing system complexity through standardized translation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The discrete optimization problem formulation serves as a universal interface that can represent any logic gate or computational problem. By converting diverse logic operations (AND, OR, NOT, XOR, etc.) into the same optimization framework, the system achieves multi-functionality where a single quantum processor can solve various computational problems with different accuracy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If multiple annealing schedules are controlled simultaneously, then optimization performance is improved, but the control complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization performanceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements dynamic control of multiple annealing schedules, where each logic gate or group of gates can have its own tailored annealing schedule. This dynamic approach allows the system to optimize the annealing process for different parts of the logic circuit independently, improving overall optimization performance by adapting the annealing rate and parameters to the specific requirements of each computational element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the efficient solution of complex computational problems by transforming logic circuit representations into discrete optimization problems that can be effectively solved using quantum processors, leveraging quantum effects to achieve accurate and efficient computation.

Implementation Method 1

solving it using a quantum processor, which enables the simultaneous control of multiple annealing schedules and the use of adiabatic quantum computation or quantum annealing to find solutions to computational problems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum annealing:

Implementation Method 2

leveraging quantum effects to achieve accurate and efficient computation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum tunneling:

Data Source

PatentUS9026574B2Systems and methods for solving computational problems
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 D WAVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US9026574B2 patent drawing
  • US9026574B2 patent drawing
  • US9026574B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Solving computational problems may include generating a logic circuit representation of the computational problem, encoding the logic circuit representation as a discrete optimization problem, and solving the discrete optimization problem using a quantum processor. Output(s) of the logic circuit representation may be clamped such that the solving involves effectively executing the logic circuit representation in reverse to determine input(s) that corresponds to the clamped output(s). The representation may be of a multiplication circuit. The discrete optimization problem may be composed of a set of miniature optimization problems, where each miniature optimization problem encodes a respective logic gate from the logic circuit representation. A multiplication circuit may employ binary representations of factors, and these binary representations may be decomposed to reduce the total number of variables required to represent the multiplication circuit.