Hybrid Quantum Annealing and Neural Network Electronic Structure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for simulating electronic structure, such as Hartree-Fock methods and density functional theory, face challenges in accuracy and computational cost, making them unfeasible for larger molecular systems, and quantum computing devices like gate model devices are limited by qubit availability and decoherence issues.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid algorithm combining quantum simulation using quantum processing units (QPUs) with classical machine learning, specifically artificial neural networks (ANNs), to predict full configuration interaction (FCI) energies, where quantum simulation results are used to train ANNs to minimize errors and generate accurate FCI energies for molecules, even those not calculable classically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If classical numerical methods (Hartree-Fock, DFT, CI) are used to solve the Schrödinger equation, then approximate solutions can be obtained, but computational cost increases and accuracy decreases for larger molecular systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of electronic structure calculationVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses quantum processing units (QPUs) as an intermediary system to solve the electronic structure problem. Instead of using classical numerical methods that struggle with scaling, the invention maps the Schrödinger equation solution onto a quantum system that naturally handles quantum mechanical calculations, using quantum annealing to find the ground state energy and wavefunction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces classical computational mechanics (numerical optimization methods like Hartree-Fock and DFT) with quantum mechanical simulation. By using QPUs to directly simulate quantum systems, the invention substitutes classical approximation algorithms with actual quantum evolution, achieving exact solutions where classical methods only provide approximations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If gate model quantum devices are used for quantum simulation, then quantum computing capability is provided, but qubit availability and decoherence limit the system size that can be simulated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum computing capabilityVSAvoidqubit stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameters of quantum devices by using quantum annealing instead of gate-based operations. This approach uses continuous parameter optimization (annealing schedule, Hamiltonian parameters) rather than discrete gate operations, making the system more robust to decoherence and suitable for near-term quantum hardware with limited qubit coherence times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic quantum annealing where the system evolves continuously from an initial Hamiltonian to a final Hamiltonian representing the molecular system. This dynamic approach allows the quantum system to adaptively find the ground state while being less sensitive to static imperfections and decoherence that plague gate-based models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If quantum annealing with QPUs is used to simulate electronic structure, then FCI energies can be determined accurately, but integration with classical computational frameworks is required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFCI energy accuracyVSAvoidhybrid system integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges quantum and classical computational systems into a hybrid architecture. The QPU handles the quantum mechanical calculation of electronic structure, while classical computers perform preprocessing (basis set selection, Hamiltonian construction) and postprocessing (energy analysis, property calculation). This combination leverages the strengths of both systems to achieve accurate FCI energies for molecules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12033728B2Simulating electronic structure with quantum annealing devices and artificial neural networks
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • US12033728B2 patent drawing
  • US12033728B2 patent drawing
  • US12033728B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Approaches, techniques, and mechanisms are disclosed for predicting molecular electronic structural information. According to one embodiment, quantum simulation results are generated for a molecule based on a quantum simulation of an electronic structure of the molecule. The quantum simulation of the electronic structure of the molecule is performed with quantum processing units. An input vector comprising data field values derived from the quantum simulation results for the molecule is created. An electronic structural information prediction model is applied to generate, based at least in part on the input vector, predicted electronic structural information for the molecule.