Quantum Processor Calibration for Scalable Qubit Control Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computing systems face challenges in efficiently and accurately calibrating large-scale superconducting qubit arrays, particularly in optimizing qubit control parameters and characterizing devices for optimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A calibration process is implemented that automates the bring-up and characterization of quantum computing systems by subdividing tasks into sub-processing units, using design parameters and measured values to determine operating parameters, and applying a defined sequence for efficient tuning and error detection, allowing for rapid characterization and optimization of quantum logic gates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated calibration processes are implemented for large-scale qubit arrays, then calibration efficiency and accuracy are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration process is divided into discrete, modular steps including qubit initialization, parameter measurement, optimization routine execution, and result recording. Each step can be independently controlled and verified, managing system complexity while maintaining calibration accuracy through systematic progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts qubit control parameters such as frequency, amplitude, and phase based on measured values from previous calibration steps. This parameter optimization continues iteratively until performance metrics meet predefined thresholds, achieving high calibration accuracy without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive device characterization is performed, then quantum logic gate performance is optimized, but calibration time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum logic gate performanceVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system performs preliminary measurements of qubit parameters such as frequency and anharmonicity before executing optimization routines. This preliminary characterization allows the system to pre-calculate optimal control parameters, reducing the time required for subsequent performance optimization while ensuring high quantum logic gate reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration process implements continuous optimization routines that iteratively adjust parameters and re-measure performance without interrupting the overall calibration flow. This continuous action ensures comprehensive device characterization for optimal quantum logic gate performance while minimizing total calibration time through efficient iterative progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If manual calibration methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but calibration efficiency and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration efficiencyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system is designed to automatically perform measurements, analyze results, and adjust parameters without human intervention. The system self-manages the entire calibration workflow including error detection, parameter optimization, and performance verification, achieving high calibration efficiency and scalability while requiring minimal operator input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration process incorporates continuous feedback loops where measurement results from qubit parameters are immediately used to adjust control settings. This automated feedback mechanism enables the system to efficiently optimize quantum logic gate performance across large-scale qubit arrays without manual recalibration, significantly improving productivity and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3593298B1Performing a calibration process in a quantum computing system
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 RIGETTI & CO INC
  • EP3593298B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3593298B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3593298B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In a general aspect, calibration is performed in a quantum computing system. In some cases, domains of a quantum computing system are identified, where the domains include respective domain control subsystems and respective subsets of quantum circuit devices in a quantum processor of the quantum computing system. Sets of measurements are obtained from one of the domains and stored in memory. Device characteristics of the quantum circuit devices of the domain are obtained based on the set of measurements, and the device characteristics are stored in a memory of the control system. Quantum logic control parameters for the subset of quantum circuit devices of the domain are obtained based on the set of measurements and stored in memory.