Quantum Circuit Cutting with Transpilation Error Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Executing large quantum circuits in quantum computing systems is hindered by limitations in qubit count and accuracy, as well as the exponential increase in resources required for simulated quantum systems, making efficient orchestration of quantum workloads challenging.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves cutting quantum circuits into smaller subcircuits while accounting for transpilation errors, using a method that considers the cost of transpilation and employs machine learning models to predict transpilation errors, thereby pruning unsatisfactory solutions from the cutting problem tree.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If quantum circuits are executed on real quantum hardware, then quantum computation can be performed, but the number of qubits is limiting and accuracy decreases with larger hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequbit countVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides large quantum circuits into smaller subcircuits that can be executed on limited quantum hardware. By segmenting the circuit into manageable portions, the system can execute circuits larger than what a single quantum device can accommodate while maintaining accuracy through careful decomposition and reconstruction of quantum states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If quantum circuits are simulated, then execution can be performed, but resources required increase exponentially with complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution capabilityVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments quantum circuits into subcircuits that can be executed on quantum hardware, avoiding the need for full simulation of large circuits. This segmentation approach reduces the exponential resource requirement by leveraging actual quantum hardware capabilities for the segmented portions rather than simulating everything classically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a classical computer as an intermediary to manage circuit decomposition, coordination, and result aggregation. This intermediary handles the complex coordination between quantum hardware executions, reducing the computational burden that would otherwise require exponential classical resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Use of energy by moving object

If circuit cutting is performed to execute large circuits, then resource consumption decreases, but transpilation errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing resourcesVSAvoidtranspilation error
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system monitors and evaluates transpilation errors during circuit cutting. By feeding back error information, the system can adjust the cutting strategy, select optimal cut points, and modify transpilation parameters to minimize error propagation while maintaining resource efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts transpilation parameters such as error thresholds, optimization levels, and cutting strategies based on the specific quantum circuit and hardware characteristics. By changing these parameters adaptively, the system optimizes the trade-off between resource consumption and transpilation accuracy for each specific execution context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If cutting operation is performed to divide quantum circuits, then execution feasibility increases, but time consumption increases due to knitting operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution feasibilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary circuit analysis and decomposition strategies before execution to optimize the cutting plan. By pre-calculating optimal cut points and preparing subcircuit execution schedules in advance, the system reduces the time required during actual execution and minimizes the knitting operation overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12223395B2Circuit cutting taking into account transpilation error
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 DELL PROD LP
  • US12223395B2 patent drawing
  • US12223395B2 patent drawing
  • US12223395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Cutting quantum circuits is disclosed. Solutions to a cutting problem of cutting a quantum circuit into quantum subcircuits are represented in a tree structure. Selected nodes are queried using a machine learning model to generate predicted transpilation metrics such as estimated transpilation error. If the prediction associated with a node fails such that the predicted transpilation error in a simulated quantum computing system is greater than an error threshold or constraint, the corresponding solutions represented by the node and the node's children are pruned from the tree structure.