Quantum Circuit Design for Cognitive Interference Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum information processing systems based on trapped atomic ions struggle to accurately model cognitive interference effects that violate classical probability assumptions, particularly in scenarios involving mutually exclusive events where the outcome is unknown.

Innovation Solution

A quantum circuit design is implemented with four components: setting the probability of an event by rotating a qubit, connecting events to influence the likelihood of subsequent events, entangling states to allow interference between incompatible outcomes, and measuring outcomes to remove other possibilities, using a system with an ion trap and optical controller to apply lasers and configure qubits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a quantum circuit is designed to model cognitive interference effects, then the ability to accurately model human decision-making patterns is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The quantum circuit is divided into four distinct functional components: (1) probability setting component that rotates qubits to fix relative angles, (2) connection component that links events to influence subsequent event likelihoods, (3) entanglement component that creates interference between incompatible outcomes, and (4) measurement component that determines event outcomes and removes other possibilities. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to model cognitive interference effects accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The circuit uses parameter changes through qubit rotations to set probabilities of events by fixing relative angles between qubits. The rotation angles are adjusted to match observed cognitive interference patterns, allowing the circuit to model different psychological scenarios by changing these angular parameters rather than redesigning the entire circuit architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If qubits are rotated to set probability of events, then the probability modeling capability is improved, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobability modeling capabilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit employs dynamic qubit rotations that can be adjusted during execution to set different probability distributions. The rotation operations are applied conditionally based on the specific cognitive model being simulated, allowing the same hardware to adapt to different probability modeling requirements by changing the rotation angles and sequences rather than requiring separate fixed circuits for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If events are entangled to allow interference between outcomes, then the modeling of cognitive interference effects is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference effect modelingVSAvoidentanglement configuration precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The entanglement component creates quantum states that copy the interference patterns observed in cognitive science experiments. By preparing quantum states that mirror the structural relationships between mutually exclusive events in human decision-making, the circuit can model cognitive interference effects without requiring physically precise manipulation of individual quantum systems, instead using standardized entanglement operations that reproduce the desired interference patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively models disjunction interference effects from cognitive science, accurately reflecting human decision-making patterns that defy classical probability rules, by determining the outcome of one event and removing other possibilities, thus enhancing the modeling of complex psychological data.

Implementation Method 1

applying a laser to an ion trap including a plurality of ions to set a probability of a single event by rotating at least one qubit of the plurality of qubits to fix a relative angle of the at least one qubit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

configuring the quantum circuit to entangle the respective plurality of events such that a plurality of states representing different potential events interfere with one another, including an interference between incompatible outcomes of at least two of the plurality of events

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuantum interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS20240095570A1System and method for quantum circuit design for cognitive interference effects
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 IONQ INC
  • US20240095570A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095570A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095570A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method is provided for designing and configuring a quantum circuit that models known “interference effects” between mutually exclusive events whose outcome is not yet known. An exemplary method includes applying a laser to an ion trap to set a probability of a single event by rotating at least one qubit; configuring the quantum circuit to connect a plurality of events, such that an outcome of the single event dictates an output of a subsequent event to be more or less likely to occur; configuring the quantum circuit to entangle the respective plurality of events such that a plurality of states representing different potential events interfere with one another, including an interference between incompatible outcomes of at least two of the plurality of events; and configuring the quantum circuit to measures the respective outcomes to model a result when the quantum computer determines an outcome of an event, such that possible outcomes of other events are removed.