Quantum Circuit T-Depth Reduction Using Control P Gate Swaps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The implementation of T gates in quantum circuits is costly and has the longest execution time, necessitating a reduction in T-depth to enhance efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the addition of control P gates and their inverses to quantum circuits, followed by swapping operations to reduce T-depth by converting subcircuits, utilizing the properties of Toffoli gates and P gates to minimize T gates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If T gates are used in quantum circuits, then the circuit can perform fault-tolerant operations, but the execution time increases due to longest T gate duration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault-toleranceVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The quantum circuit is segmented into multiple layers based on T-depth, allowing parallel execution of independent T gate operations across different layers. This segmentation reduces the sequential execution time while preserving fault-tolerance capabilities through maintained gate functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The circuit depth is dynamically optimized by identifying and exploiting parallel execution opportunities among T gates. The method adaptively restructures the circuit to minimize sequential dependencies, reducing overall execution time while maintaining the necessary fault-tolerant operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If more T gates are used to achieve desired quantum operations, then the computational power increases, but the T-depth and execution time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational powerVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple T gates that can operate independently are merged into parallel layers. The method combines compatible operations across different circuit paths into the same time layer, reducing the overall T-depth while preserving the full computational capability of the individual gates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The circuit optimization moves from a one-dimensional sequential view to a two-dimensional layered structure, where the vertical dimension represents time layers and the horizontal dimension represents parallel operations. This dimensional transformation enables simultaneous execution of multiple T gates without increasing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Duration of action of moving object

If T-depth is reduced by removing T gates, then execution time decreases, but the fault-tolerance and computational capability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution timeVSAvoidfault-tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization changes the parameter being minimized from total T gate count to T-depth (maximum gates in any sequential path). This parameter transformation allows maintaining the same number of T gates while reducing execution time by enabling parallel execution, thus preserving fault-tolerance without sacrificing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12596944B2Quantum circuit T-depth reduction method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US12596944B2 patent drawing
  • US12596944B2 patent drawing
  • US12596944B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein method and apparatus for reducing a T-depth. According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, there is provided a quantum circuit T-depth reduction method comprising: receiving a quantum circuit including two Toffoli gates and a first quantum circuit between the two Toffoli gates; adding a pair of first control P gate and second control P gate to the quantum circuit; and swapping the first quantum circuit and any one of the first control P gate and the second control P gate such that the first quantum circuit is disposed between the first control P gate and the second control P gate.