Quantum Weak Coin Flipping for Trustless Randomness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In distributed and trustless environments, existing cryptographic protocols struggle to generate randomness with sufficient entropy, making them vulnerable to malicious parties exploiting weak encryption, and they are not quantum-safe, assuming a majority of nodes are honest, or susceptible to passive attacks.

Innovation Solution

A quantum weak coin-flipping protocol is employed, where parties participate in pair-wise quantum weak coin flipping with each other, sharing decisions to generate a random value, determining the number of rounds based on a predetermined acceptable bias value, ensuring all parties contribute equally without a trusted third party, and using noiseless quantum channels to prevent eavesdropping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If classical cryptographic protocols are used for randomness generation in distributed systems, then the system can operate with simple communication mechanisms, but the generated randomness has insufficient entropy and is vulnerable to manipulation by malicious parties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrustworthiness of randomness generationVSAvoidcomplexity of cryptographic protocol
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces classical cryptographic protocols with quantum cryptographic protocols for randomness generation. The quantum protocol uses quantum mechanical principles (superposition, entanglement, measurement) to generate randomness that is fundamentally unpredictable and cannot be manipulated by malicious parties, thereby improving reliability while accepting increased protocol complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the cryptographic system from classical to quantum domain. By utilizing quantum states and measurements, the system achieves higher entropy randomness generation that is provably secure against manipulation, transforming the nature of the cryptographic primitive itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a trusted third party is introduced to coordinate randomness generation among distributed parties, then the entropy and security of the generated randomness is improved, but the trustless and distributed nature of the system is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentropy of generated randomnessVSAvoidtrustless operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the trusted third party from the randomness generation process. Instead of relying on a central authority, the system uses distributed quantum protocols where each party contributes quantum randomness locally, and the collective outcome is generated through coordinated quantum measurements without requiring any single trusted entity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The distributed parties perform randomness generation themselves using their own quantum systems and local measurements. Each party contributes their own quantum randomness and participates in the protocol autonomously, eliminating the need for external trusted coordination while maintaining high entropy through the combination of independent quantum sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If existing cryptographic schemes are used in distributed settings, then the implementation is straightforward with standard protocols, but the schemes are susceptible to passive attacks and not quantum-safe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidvulnerability to attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces classical cryptographic schemes with quantum cryptographic schemes that are inherently resistant to both classical and quantum attacks. The quantum protocol uses principles such as the no-cloning theorem and measurement disturbance to provide security that is provably safe against passive eavesdropping and future quantum computational attacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates quantum security principles from the outset of the protocol design, providing beforehand protection against both current and future attack vectors. By using quantum mechanics to establish security guarantees before any attack occurs, the system cushions against vulnerabilities that would affect classical schemes, including those from quantum computers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS20230376813A1Generating randomness in distributed and trustless settings
Publication Date: 2023.11.23 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US20230376813A1 patent drawing
  • US20230376813A1 patent drawing
  • US20230376813A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Generation of randomness (e.g., a random value) using a protocol based on quantum weak coin flipping amongst a plurality of participating parties. The protocol allows computation of the exact initial bias and may include determining a number of rounds of exchange in a quantum weak coin flipping algorithm to achieve a predetermined maximum bias value. In turn, quantum weak coin flipping may be performed in a pair-wise fashion amongst all of the plurality of participating parties. A result of each pair-wise quantum weak coin flipping instance may be shared with another of the plurality of participating parties other than the parties participating in generating the result. In turn, the results of each pair-wise quantum weak coin flipping instance may be combined to provide a random value that may be used as a cryptographic key or as a seed to some cryptographic function.